data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a15c7/a15c7a15d2c3519b0d1aca3cd9d0262089b12120" alt=""
Buncombe County Republican representative Tim Moffitt has managed to impose his will on the voters by manipulating a "local bill" through the General Assembly that he thinks will give him a Republican majority on the Buncombe County Commission ... just like in the Mecklenburg and the Guildford County cases.
Gordon Smith at Scrutiny Hooligans has the whole sordid story.
3 comments:
Like any good Teahadist, I dislike larger governments telling smaller governments what to do, and I don't think Moffit's way was the right way.
But try to take off your partisan blinders and think about this. Allowing each voter to vote on each seat means that a 60% majority can always secure 100% of the seats and completely deny a 40% minority any voice. Sure enough, in 2010 Buncombe had a 60/40 split, but that 40% minority doesn't have a single representative on the current commission. Yea, democracy, huh?
This cuts both ways. Imagine being a Democrat in Wyoming and knowing you've never sent a Democrat to Washington since Dick Cheney won in 1977.
This is also why the VRA calls on states to create minority-majority districts--because otherwise the minority's voice might be permanently silenced. If you're not comfortable with the VRA analogy, this is why many European countries and Japan use proportional representation--so a minority can reliably secure a voice.
In America's federal system, the institutional logic of Moffit's bill is the same as the VRA. If a local government denies a large minority a voice in politics, that minority takes its case to its allies in a more powerful government, asking them to force the local government to give them a voice.
This doesn't mean we should applaud Moffit, but it does mean you should try to think a little deeper before tossing off superficial rhetoric like the OP.
I'm sure if this was a Democrat pulling the same trick we would have quite a few Teahadist heads exploding...I doubt you would be so understanding.
Good post Voice. I agree...state should not have gotten involved unless they are going to pass a state wide mandate.
It does make sense for each district to elect it's own represntative (for the reasons you stated). The county wide vote would be similar to a state wide vote for our state senators.
Post a Comment