Pity the People Left on the Beach

 

I see a lot of ink today amazed at yesterday's Indiana Republican primaries for General Assembly seats. Trump endorsed seven of his dogs against seven stubborn state senate Republican incumbents, and the incumbents got chewed the hell up. Fox News was thrilled to report that Trump Is Still Lord. Others couldn't help but notice the Mafia vibes in the sudden death of politicians who had refused to kiss the ring (re-jigger the state's congressional maps). Many reporters noticed the severed horsehead in the bed. Don't cross boss Trump.

I say "good!" to those Republican primaries. I'm counting on the cult's keeping its politicians firmly in the trumpy mold, under the trumpy thumb, because it will be an ever more convenient target for the Blue Wave, as the opposition to Trump picks up more independents and disgusted lifelong Republicans. There are actually very good conservatives who don't like mob bosses and wide-open corruption. To have a clear and unitary enemy with a brand name and a history is a pure-dee gift for the goddamned Democratic Party.

Otherwise reasonable, logical men and women who hold office as elected Republicans have weighed their choices, and they've consciously chosen to throw in with whatever Trump says or demands or does, because that's the way politics works, at least politics in a democracy that demands votes. We join parties, and even when we can plainly see our party's alienating the majority, or that our leader is fucking wrong, we stick with our party. 'Tis better to die together than hang separately. 'Tis actually better to die for someone's stupidity than never to have taken a side at all and declared our values. (We would have made excellent soldiers in Pickett's frontal attack at Gettysburg, and would probably have considered it both right and fitting pro patria mori.)

Lord knows how many masts I've lashed myself to over the last 60 years of political advocacy and community organizing, only to see the whole ship go down and me with it. I get the psychology of staying with the sinking ship. It's considered noble -- in a fashion that Falstaff would have mocked as folly, but still. What's the alternative to embracing defeat when it's inevitable? Disengagement? And the blissful aloofness of independents who always piously claim, "I vote for the man, not the party"? That kind of cynical detachment is unthinkable for the likes of us, the eternally engaged and outraged. We are known for the fiber of our spines because we have experienced political death and have returned, often transformed by death, not quite like the phoenix but maybe more like stinkweeds that develop rhizomes.

So I applaud the wholly owned Trump Party, once known as the GOP. Keep the faith, babies, but don't park your beach chairs on the sand. 

 

Sam Page Braves the Rampaging Public School Teachers

 

Look who came to the teachers protest march on Friday in Raleigh:

Rockingham County Sheriff and NC "Senator Elect" Sam Page seemed only too happy to associate himself with the protesting teachers in Raleigh last Friday. He was there to shake hands, give interviews, and ingratiate himself with a voting bloc not any other Republican General Assembly member would associate with. But Sam Page was there to share the message: Damnit, there's no state budget, and teacher pay has sunk to 46th lowest in the nation. Page was overheard telling Christina Cole, president-elect of the NC Assoc. of Educators (NCAE), and others that "teacher pay needs to be raised to highest in the Southeast." Cardinal and Pine had video of him saying forthrightly that raising teacher pay was his top priority, that and public safety. Several pics of him posing with individual NCAE members appeared on social media. He created something of a stir.

Of course he was wearing one of his cowboy hats, a sensible straw. The hat's a sigil -- "NOTICE ME" --and the name "Sheriff Sam Page" is already well known to people who follow North Carolina politics, which would include a sizable number of public school teachers. Especially the ones who know he beat Senate President Phil Berger who was no friend to teachers. As far as anyone has testified, Page was the only Republican politician to show his face on Friday. Cool move, partly because it is causing agita among fierce MAGAs, who go rigid when reminded that May Day protests were once a vehicle for the International Communist Party.

I'd like to think that Sam Page showed up -- if even for a little while (I doubt he marched) -- because he's a good guy on the need to pay our public school teachers a living wage. He didn't have to do that for votes. It's quite certain that he will beat the Democrat running against him in November. It's an R+9 district. He doesn't need the teachers' votes but he's embracing a message that will cause the gnashing of teeth for the man who Page beat and who has been the chief block against treating teachers right. 

 

"Far Right Fielder"

 

Have not seen an attack on Congresswoman Virginia Foxx before that's quite as hard as this one

 

This popped up on Facebook -- no indication of who produced it. It has the earmarks of an independent expenditure, but it might also be a purely homegrown expression of contempt for Virginia Foxx. Doubt it. The level of professional  polish here suggests money. First time I've seen this. If it's showing up in other venues, with or without a "Paid for by" declaration, I'd like to hear about it. Anybody?

The attack does not even mention Democrat Chuck Hubbard, nor does it say anything about an election. The display is meant to lower Foxx's favorables, not explicitly boost Hubbard's.

Is the attack effective? It's all about her age, which is fair, and tying her to Trump policies, which notoriously can cut both ways in the 5th District. She's done what she can to make sure there's no air between her arms and Donald Jethro Trump, and this attack supports that. Many people in the 5th like her precisely for that. The strangest call-out: "She was 26 years old when Neil Armstrong stepped on the moon." A strange slap again at her advanced age, but baroquely obscure compared to the visual trainwreck of the photograph.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Is Zach Wahls the Next Iowa Senator?

 

Greeted this a.m. with news that Sen. Elizabeth Warren would be making campaign appearances on behalf of Zach Wahls in the Iowa Democratic senatorial primary coming up on June 2nd. That Iowa Senate primary is another hot Democratic contest of left insurgency vs. establishmentarian moderation, by which I mean Chuck Schumer's preferred (safe) candidate -- Josh Turek, a 46-year-old Gold Medalist in wheelchair basketball -- is clearly losing to a younger (dangerous) Wahls, who is polling well ahead of Turek. Wahls also wins hypothetical matchups with the Republican candidate he'll face in the fall. It's an open seat because Joni Ernst had had enough.

So I needed to refresh my memory about Zach Wahls: Way back in 2011, as the 19-year-old straight man and former Eagle Scout raised by married lesbians, Wahls stood up during public comment in an Iowa House hearing about a bill to ban gay marriage in the state's constitution and delivered a clear and impassioned defense of his own family. That speech went viral online, quickly garnering a half-million views on YouTube which eventually climbed into the millions. Here is it again, if you have a hankering for persuasion and the language arts:  

 

 

Wahls was a new student at the University of Iowa, studying engineering, when he made that 3-minute speech. He became instantly famous, an unapologetically heterosexual young man who was raised (very well, as it turns out) by two lesbians. No one could speak more powerfully for gay rights. He dropped out of the engineering program to write a book that was published in 2012, My Two Moms: Lessons of Love, Strength, and What Makes a Family. He became a public speaker willing to challenge orthodoxy. A Catholic college felt compelled to cancel not one but two scheduled appearances by Wahls, sponsored by the Gay-Straight Alliance and the College Democrats, after his book came out. That September of 2012 Wahls was given a speaking slot at the Democratic National Convention in which he thanked President Obama for the courage to support same-sex marriage.

Wahls went back to the University of Iowa and got his degree but kept active in Democratic Party politics. He became a Hillary Clinton delegate to the National Convention in 2016, the same year he earned his degree. In 2018 he ran for a safe Democratic state Senate seat, and in 2021 he was voted Senate Minority Leader by his colleagues.

Wahls's rise has been steady and deliberate. But the articulation of difficult topics by a surprisingly mature 19-year-old in 2011 has matured (hardened in a sense) into accomplished politician-speak. He's so prepared and so damn articulate that he can begin to sound rote. He and Graham Platner may end up being sworn into the same Senate, and would be political allies (we assume), but in manner they are very different. Graham Platner's economic populism smacks of lived experience which doesn't do weak nibbling around the edges. Platner's populism is plain-spoken and tough minded. Wahls's seems more rehearsed. He talks in paragraphs. His attachment to the Democratic establishment message about "affordability" doesn't have the smell of sweat about it. Here is Wahls recently on Morning Joe: 

 

The Rain in Maine

 

BREAKING NEWS: Governor Janet Mills drops out of the Maine Democratic senatorial primary. She had once been considered a front-runner to take on Sen. Susan Collins this November. 

Something of a political bombshell. Mills had been "aggressively recuited" to run by Chuck Schumer. She was supported by Emily's List and other prominent liberal groups. As governor she was well known in Maine, had a life in politics behind her (attorney general and member of the Maine House) which came with all the money connections she'd ever need (we thought). Plus she was famous for one bit of video. She had been the lone woman who stood up to Trump at the White House when she defied him about trans rights. But what was super cool about a female governor willing to say to Trump's face on that occasion, "see you in court!" curiously did not translate into any groundswell of support, and she said forthrightly today that she was ending her campaign because she was out of money and had poor prospects for raising more.

Renegade Democratic candidate Graham Platner was polling well ahead of her -- by over a whopping 30 points. Platner has been running away with the primary as someone so authentic and so obviously logical that all the mainstream branding as "left-wing radical," compounded by liberals' clutching their hearts over three very old Reddit posts, had not blunted his rise as a progressive hero. Platner incidentally and willingly owns the hotheaded stupidity of those posts, admitting that he had been an angry young man, back from his 4th combat deployment in Afghanistan, alone, and isolated. Those words do not represent who he was deep down even then and certainly not who he is now. Listening to him talk sense, clearly enunciating a philosophy based on a deep historical understanding of how best to wield power for equity and fairness, I see a winner.

I recommend the interview with Platner that John Stewart did for his podcast (YouTube). Stewart prods Platner a little on why someone with his populist and sometimes libertarian instincts, coming out of the Marine Corps with its hyper-masculine warrior culture, why he wasn't attracted to or "captured" by the Alt Right. Platner's response is humbling: "I read a lot of history books." If he's something of a roughneck, he's an intellectual roughneck who has the right understanding that the failures of the Democratic Party are failures of courage and nerve. 

  

Platner was recruited by a group of labor activists looking for other working people to run in key races. They came to Platner -- who was prominent as a Bernie Sanders fan and a local official on the Eastern Shore of Maine as well as a working oyster farmer who knew the lives and needs of working people -- and they offered him an immediate three things to jump-start a senate campaign: a professionally produced "launch" video, access to small-dollar fundraising, and exposure in the press. The launch video alone in August 2025 got over 2 million views in 24 hours (one of those viewers was me), raised a million dollars, and incited almost 3,000 volunteers willing to hit the streets and the phones for Graham Platner. I immediately wrote enthusiastically about what I was seeing.

"The enemy is the oligarchy!" Graham Platner's launch video: 

 

 

Graham Platner scares at least one of the NC Democratic strategists that I listen to, whose opinion I respect, who is more moderate than I in his enthusiasms, and who has already predicted that Platner can't ultimately beat Collins because his "radical" grassroots intellectualism will end up doing him in. That analysis is based on past history of liberal forces getting way out over their skies and ending up massively disappointed. I'm actually more worried, especially after watching the Jon Stewart podcast, about what establishment grinding Graham Platner will undergo as a senator in Mugstomp-on-the-Potomac. I'm a little shy about unpolished surfaces ever since John Fetterman made an unconventional pitch for support and promptly got coopted.

On the other hand, perhaps when Platner gets to the Senate he can lead Fetterman gently back to the light. Platner has that kind of serious pastor aura about him, signaling that he would always try to rescue the perishing and care for the dying. He's got true Marine purpose. 

 

Disappearance of a Religious Freedom Advisor

 

Former 3-term Congressman Mark Walker couldn't even hang onto the sinecure (job with no duties) that Trump invented for him as a consolation prize after he ended Walker's political career by endorsing Ted Budd instead of him for the US Senate in 2022 and then squeak-toy Addison McDowell instead of him for Congress in the 2024 Republican primary in the 6th Congressional District. Walker had even trudged to Mar-a-Lago like a good little supplicant and begged Trump to endorse him instead of Ted Budd for Senate and reportedly agreed to drop out and run for a congressional seat if only Trump would endorse him for that. Kissing the ring sucks when it's both fruitless and the boss stinks.

So because of whatever sympathy Trump felt for the man, he invented a title specially for Walker: Ambassador-at-Large for International Religious Freedom, to be attached to the State Department, a completely made-up job with no defined duties. But appointment to ambassador required Senate approval, and for whatever reasons, both senators Thom Tillis and Ted Budd wouldn't support him. The nomination died, and Trump went another route, appointed Walker as "Principal Advisor on Global Religious Freedom" in a wholly invented new position at the State Department. Walker lasted just 90 days. On April 21 (just last week!), the State Department made the terse announcement that Mark Walker no longer worked at the State Department  -- no explanation given.

Walker used to be a pastor of a church and casts a mild aura, though he was tough enough to beat Phil Berger Jr. in his very first Republican primary -- and the subsequent runoff -- for the 6th CD in 2014. The entire Berger Family Machine had been in full gear for Junior, and Berger did indeed beat Walker in the first round: 34.27% to 25.20% (in a very crowded field of seven other candidates). But by the runoff between Berger and Walker in July 2014, Walker had turned it around and he beat young Berger by 20 points -- 59.85% to Berger's 40%. Walker won that runoff by hitting every church picnic and community rag-pulling across the 6th, showing the people what a mild-mannered and approachable Christian he was, a defender of God and American rural values. He was better at grassroots campaigning than Berger, and he sharpened his attack on Berger, implying he was essentially a bought-and-paid for arm of a machine that feathered its own nest -- thus reminding voters of the Berger Family reputation for shady power moves (a reputation that would ultimately end Phil Berger Senior's career after he became a failed promoter of gambling casinos). I suspect Walker beat Phil Berger Jr. at the cost of making an eternal enemy out of Daddy, and I have to wonder if Berger animosity is behind the downward trajectory of Walker's career.  

Anyway, apparently the Trump State Department no longer needs the services of an advisor on global religious freedom.

 

Paranoia and Panic in Moore County

 

Moore Co. March 2026. Lefist soldiers

are clever with camouflage

 

 

The following paragraph appeared on a MAGA blog and could have been headlined, "Leftist Soldiers Already Operating in Rural NC!" but was actually (and ominously enough) titled "GOP dawdles, radical left making inroads into small-town NC":

While establishment Republicans gaze at their navels and pontificate on nonsense, leftists are moving their soldiers into our communities. They are organizing within our communities. They are taking advantage of low-turnout and *non-partisan* local races to get their people into positions of influence. It’s similar to the strategy behind the flood of illegals streaming across the southern border: move in, out-breed and out-vote the natives. [bolding in the original post]

 

What got this writer so exercised? Why, an immediate threat to the world as it ought to be -- a very large No Kings protest march back in March, organized by "Soros-connected" Indivisible in Southern Pines, the second-largest city in "bright-RED Moore County, where Democrats are usually lucky to get 25 to 35 percent of the vote." In 2024, Kamala Harris eked out 34.69% of the presidential vote. But now, after more than a full year of corruption and incompetence (Trump 2.0), there are a lot of unhappy people in Moore County. Local reports focused on the "large turnout" both marching up and down the sidewalks on Morganton Road in Southern Pines, with even more people lining the sidewalks and cheering on the marchers.

 

To the author of the MAGA blog, those people are analogous to a plague of brown-skinned workers who move in, out-breed and out-vote the natives. 

 

This moment of comedy brought to you by paranoia and panic. (When a tsunami is coming, grab your beach chair and RUN.)

 

That Bourbon Trail Tour that Ray Pickett Attended Has Now Produced Indictments

 

In May 2024, investigative reporter Bryan Anderson named Watauga Rep. Ray Pickett as among the North Carolina General Assembly Republicans who spent a wild time visiting distilleries around Frankfort, Ky., all expenses paid (which were considerable), but paid by whom? (The trip itself was outed on Reddit by a disgruntled employee at one distillery who described the visiting legislators as a bunch of swaggering Southern yahoos disturbing the peace and vomiting in sinks.)

The answer to who paid and was it legal came yesterday when a Wake County grand jury handed down four indictments of Raleigh lobbyists who induced companies they represented to underwrite the entire trip, thus violating the gift ban in North Carolina law that's supposed to keep our legislators from being wined and dined for legislative favors. (Or "Bourbon-ed and boiled" might be the better phrase.) 

After all, the pious, stated excuse for the whole trip to Kentucky was to celebrate "conservative business values," which (we've heard said by many people) are easier to celebrate in an alcoholic haze.

The charges against the lobbyists are mere misdemeanors, showing just how seriously our laws take gifting and grifting elected representatives, all of whom are scot-free in the affair. No NC lawmakers have been charged with anything, though some of them may have some 'splaining to do for not reporting everything on their disclosure forms.

In Texas, It's the Context, Stupid!

 

Reading about the 5th Circuit's decision in the Texas 10 Commandments case, sent me into reveries about my own experience with religion in Texas public school classrooms. 

ME AND MY SHADOW

I was a student in Texas public schools from 1st grade through high school graduation -- the 1950s through the election of John F. Kennedy. Of course I was indoctrinated. In grade school, first thing of a morning we had Bible readings and prayers blasted into every classroom over a speaker system -- pious little moments to start the school day. They were probably majority Southern Baptist in hue and flavor, if I were betting, but at least pointedly Protestant, not that theology meant squat to me at that age. The Bible readings and prayers -- "devotionals," they were called -- were meant to make us "mindful," quiet and observant, tamed for classroom decorum by Protestant doctrines of sin and punishment. I'm sure those devotionals were tactical for teachers and administrators, who probably preferred their children guilt-ridden and docile.

Though I learned the 10 Commandments at church, not at school, I'll be honest here and say out loud that I don't think the display of the 10 Commandments in every classroom of my upbringing would have hurt me. Actually reading them now could start a lot of arguments, or at least a lot of wide-ranging thought, like when did "Remember the Sabbath day" become "Your butt better be in a pew on Sunday"? The Protestant text of the commandments -- which is actually quoted in the 5th Circuit majority's opinion -- gets me asking all sorts of questions -- like, did the original author of the Commandments -- looking at you, Jesus -- know nothing about human nature? To outlaw coveting things your neighbor has, including his wife and his slaves, guaranteed a pretty universal participation in sin, don't you think? And I have other questions about just exactly what "land" God has given us -- or who is the "thee" he gave it to if not us? And what does honoring father and mother have to do with keeping that land? 

I concur with the 5th Circuit majority in the need to review the actual text: 

I AM the LORD thy God.

Thou shalt have no other gods before me.

Thou shalt not make to thyself any graven images.

Thou shalt not take the Name of the Lord thy God in vain.

Remember the Sabbath day, to keep it holy.

Honor thy father and thy mother, that thy days may be long upon the land
which the Lord thy God giveth thee.

Thou shalt not kill.

Thou shalt not commit adultery.

Thou shalt not steal.

Thou shalt not bear false witness against thy neighbor.

Thou shalt not covet thy neighbor’s house.

Thou shalt not covet thy neighbor’s wife, nor his manservant, nor his
maidservant, nor his cattle, nor anything that is thy neighbor's.

The Commandments are a somewhat quaint, historically resonant, very culturally specific document that every kid should know, but having it forced on kids' -- and their parents, not to mention teachers unwilling to be conduits of partisan thought-control -- by state legislators and Ken Paxton, whose motives have little to do with education but a great dealt to do with the winds of conservative orthodoxy and the wielding of power -- that is the context that made SB 10 a threat. 

  

BACKGROUND TO THE LAWSUIT

1. Gov. Greg Abbott signed Texas SB 10 into law in 2025, which mandated the "conspicuous" display of the Protestant 10 Commandments in each and every Texas classroom, from 1st grade to 12th, with "a typeface visible from anywhere in the room." The posters were mandated to be at least 16 inches wide and 20 inches tall. Schools were not required to purchase the posters. They were ordered to accept donations of them. (And if that doesn't sound like a bag job of ulterior motives, I don't know what would!) SB 10 was part of a much broader conservative push since God put Trump in the White House as 2nd Son to censor library books, clamp down on "deviance," and "infuse Christianity into public schools."

2. Some 15 parents of school-age children in certain Texas school districts became the plaintiffs in an ACLU challenge to SB 10, and the parents won in two different Federal District courts, which first halted the law in the specific 15 school districts represented by the plaintiffs and then enjoined it statewide, ruling it was likely, on the face of it, that SB 10 violated the "establishment of religion" clause in the US Constitution. 

3. Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton, that scourge of God who appears to have been behind much of the push for the 10 Commandments law, appealed to the 5th Circuit in January, and the 17 active judges on the Circuit heard the case en banc. They decided 9-8 that the Texas law is not coercive because it does not require students to learn the Ten Commandments nor does it give teachers authority to undermine students’ religious beliefs. 

But the best reading in the 118-page 5th District ruling are the several dissents appended by the eight judges who know a stinkbug when they see one. 

How Much Fatter Can He Get Before He Explodes?

 

Harper's Weekly, 1871

 

 

The Campaign Legal Center (CLC), a non-profit government watchdog org founded in 2002 by a former chair of the Federal Election Commission, has cataloged very specific instances of "pay-to-play" corruption by the Donald J. Trump administration. It's an infuriating list partly because the corruption is spectacularly theatrical in its unembarrassed obviousness. Beware the man who can't be embarrassed, my mom always said.

Take the pardon for Paul Walczak, the former nursing home executive who pleaded guilty in Nov. 2024 to tax crimes arising from his use of over $10 million withheld from the paychecks of nursing home staff to pay for personal expenses, including luxury goods and travel. In April 2025, Walczak was sentenced to 18 months imprisonment and ordered to pay over $4.4 million in restitution. Twelve days later an unembarrassed Trump gave him a presidential pardon -- purely coincidental, we're sure, to the $1 mil that Walczak's mother donated to MAGA Inc., Trump's super-PAC.

Or take Mr. Timothy J. Leiweke, a CEO indicted for bid-rigging, who got a Trump pardon following a round of golf at Mar-a-Lago for Leiweke's lawyers, who may have reminded the president that Mr. Leiweke's company had made a hefty donation to Trump's 2nd Inaugural. 

In 2023, the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) charged crypto-currency entrepreneur and investor Justin Sun and three of his companies with illegally offering and selling unregistered crypto securities. Soon after, Sun bought $18.6 million worth of $TRUMP, the Donald Trump “meme coin,” making Justin Sun the leading holder of $TRUMP and therefore worthy of an invite to Trump’s private “crypto dinner” at the White House in May 2025 (most attendees were top purchasers of the $TRUMP meme coin). Sun had also previously invested $75 million into crypto tokens issued by World Liberty Financial, the Trump family crypto venture managed by President Trump’s sons Eric and Donald Trump, Jr. As soon as Trump got his rump into the Oval Office in January 2025, almost magically, the SEC paused its enforcement action again Sun and his companies.

CLC summarized the whole sordid round-up of demonstrable pay-to-play:

Multimillion-dollar political donors have been rewarded with prominent government positions and the power to financially benefit their own bottom lines; seven-figure corporate donations have translated to executive branch support for legislative and policy positions; major media companies seeking to stay in the administration’s good graces have paid Trump millions of dollars to settle meritless lawsuits; federal investigations and enforcement actions have dissolved for the right price.

The cases of public corruption cataloged by the Campaign Legal Center make for the slightly dizzying realization that 2nd Trump is the most nakedly corrupt, on-the-make, aggressively avaricious bunch to have ever ruled the District of Columbia (and I see your Warren G. Harding). I wouldn't want, nor could I imagine anything worse than we've experienced just since January 20, 2025. Donald Trump begins to resemble the gluttonous Mr. Creosote in Monty Python's The Meaning of Life, who literally explodes, a victim of his own obscene appetite.

 

 

 

 

A Tale of Maps

 

Abuse and revenge. That's the pattern of Democratic and Republican gerrymandering for the last 20-some years in North Carolina.

I love maps, especially historical ones and most especially historical ones that show changes to landmasses over time, like "The Roman Empire At Its Height" and "The Dissolution of the Austro-Hungarian Empire." Today, it's "The Evolution of North Carolina Gerrymandering" put together by Carolina Forward -- a compilation of historic maps of Congressional districts under both parties, analyzing how Ds and Rs fared. (Blair Reeves has built Carolina Forward into a go-to source for new data and for endorsements of General Assembly candidates. Reeves' frequent videos on Facebook are always enlightening about what's really happening in our state.)

Map 1, the last gerrymander of the Dem bosses before the Tea Party eruption of 2010, still makes me wince. The abuse looks palpable. But as the analysis points out, that gerrymander actually produced majorities of Republican reps in some 2-year cycles and a near-even swap in others. The election of 2008 stands out for its Democratic surge, which elected 8 Dems to 5 GOP House members. You might note that 8 Dem reps serving 2009-2011 is the highest Dem count in the last 20+ years. With improved computer programs, the GOP has done much more advanced gerrymandering, managing to arrange us voters so there are now 10 Rs to 4 Ds (Maps 2 and 4). Map 3, the court-appointed one that lasted only one election cycle, produced the first even split between the parties -- 7 Ds to 7 Rs. 

Those were the days, my friends! 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

  

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

   

 

The Self-Parody of Franklin Graham

 

I have a church history. I sat in a hard wooden pew three times a week from the age of 12 until I went off to college at 18 (and found perdition). I've been harangued as a hormonal teenager by a pastor who demanded I reject worldly ways and turn away from temptation. I've been told by another preacher of the Gospel that I was inviting the Devil into my life by watching TV. I've been electrified by an evangelist who told us, as Christians, that we had every right to demand God smite the wicked wicked world on our behalf, and that if we did not pray with muscle and sweat, we were insufficient in our faith. I've been elated -- transported into the bare rafters -- by a visiting Christian platform performer who embodied the bubbling smug champagne of knowing we're saved and most others are lost.

I freed myself of preachers. I turned to other idols. Great is the God Irony. 

Last Thursday, Reverend Franklin Graham posted on Facebook an hilarious self-parody of the preacherdom I left behind:

I do not believe President Trump would knowingly depict himself as Jesus Christ — that would certainly be inappropriate. I’m thankful the President has made it very clear that this was not at all what he thought the AI-generated image was representing — he thought it was a doctor helping someone, and when he learned of the concerns, he immediately removed the post.

 

It's weak, limping around "that would certainly be inappropriate" with "I'm thankful the President has made it very clear yada yada" -- because, after all, Franklin Graham has been the main one to say that Trump is ordained by God and represents the living hand of Jesus Christ on earth. Which boxes the preacher in. "I do not believe Trump would depict himself as Jesus" is just plain bearing false witness. I chuckled as I read it. Pride goeth. 

 

Syndrome Rules

 

A whole civilization will die tonight, never to be brought back again. I don’t want that to happen, but it probably will.

--Donald J. Trump, April 7, 2026 

 

 

He really has become a 'toon, hasn't he? A mad tyrant or boy genius who got too big for his breeches, essentially the creation of paint, lighting, and gall. If we can see through the pathetic affectation of his pose, surely the Iranians can. And are laughing.

 

Also probably wondering, "Would he really do it?" -- along with some of the rest of us! It might occur to us that this time he boxed himself in so tight, delivering such dire ultimatums that can't be retracted without the great risk of looking like ... well, a 'toon.

 

If he does tonight what he promised this morning, it will be the end of him. The people of the United States are not going to tolerate it, finally -- Trump's final solution -- and the world will rise up in horror and condemnation. Arrest warrants from the World Court. That kind of thing. Talk about being boxed in! But he was never going to follow through on the threat. The threat was as empty as he is.

 

Another possibility -- and quite an attractive one for Trump, because he's a cold-blooded liar -- would be to claim some concession from the Iranians, whether one exists or not, and forestall hell on earth through some fiction that at least sounds plausible. Even MAGA true believers might heave a sigh of relief, while the liberals will all be slapping their knees and chortling "TACO!"

 

And finally, the remote possibility that the Iranians actually cave, because they haven't seen enough Hollywood endings.

Congressman Lists Addresses Where He Hopes Protesters Won't Show Up. Oops

 

Photo 828NewsNOW

 

 

Last November, Progressive activist Leslie Boyd of Asheville called for a boycott of Congressman Chuck Edwards's McDonald's restaurants because of his voting record:

“He says he stands for us, but he voted to reduce the availability of health care and food assistance for millions of Americans, including his own constituents,” Leslie Boyd said, speaking as a leader of Asheville Fights Back Network and calling for a walking picket at an Edwards McDonald's in Hendersonville. “He also voted for the torment of immigrants we’re seeing in the streets of North Carolina right now. That looks to me like he is the enemy.”

On March 31st, Boyd published on Facebook that she'd gotten a letter banning her for life from Edwards's McDonald's restaurants:

OK, this is freaking hilarious!!!!

My "representative " in Congress, Chuck Edwards, sent me a certified letter banning me from all his McDonald's restaurants.

First of all, I haven't eaten at a McDonald's in more than 25 years, so that's really no skin off my nose.

But here's the best part: He has hidden all their [McDonald's] addresses in real estate holding companies, so I couldn't figure out which ones were his.

Well, now I know, and now, so do you.

The letter:

 

Cost/Benefit for the Better Educated

 

I always have my doubts about hot-news social science research ("Being liberal extends your life!"), but this research below seems solidly based in math (econ) and matches the impression I've had after some 64 years of inhabiting various college and university campuses and hanging at numerous coffee pots to hear the gossip. So for what it's worth: 

The Postsecondary Education & Economics Research Center at American University, using research from the Yale Tobin Center for Economic Policy "found that graduate degrees in medicine, law and pharmacy generally have the highest return on investment. By contrast, degrees in popular fields such as social work, psychology, and curriculum and instruction may actually have a zero to negative return after factoring in the full cost." (WashPost)

Yikes. 

 

The Man Who Shut Down Early Voting at Western Carolina

 

Bill Thompson, presiding

 

 

Bill Thompson, the new Republican chair of the Jackson County Board of Elections, has managed to establish an early reputation as a nasty piece of work. But isn't that the way Phil Berger and Tim Moore intended election administration to go in North Carolina? They changed the law, put themselves in charge of elections, and just naturally attracted the meanest and most partisan people to make things as difficult as possible.

As chair of the Jackson BOE, it was Thompson who led the nasty move of killing an early voting site at Western Carolina University. “ By law, we could have just one site in Jackson County,” Thompson warned, ignoring evidence that the WCU early voting site was the most used in the county. “One site is required for every 30,000 voters. We've got four, that's plenty.”

Two complaints were lodged with the NC State BOE against Bill Thompson for his conduct in a Cullowee precinct polling place during the March primary. A voter, seconded by two other witnesses, and an actual poll worker both filed complaints on the second day of early voting, saying Thompson came into the polling site talking trash about Muslims and saying that both Germany and France were ruined now because of the Muslim invasion, and that he especially didn't trust Germans. The poll worker who heard all this was born in Germany and he summed up the grief  brief against Bill Thompson, that "he exposed deep and unfounded disgust against Muslims and their faith as well as any non-European culture.”

Bill Thompson's not the first bigot to chair a board of elections, but still....

The NC BOE on March 25th (last Wednesday) held an initial review to determine whether the complaints against Thompson "presented sufficient evidence of misconduct or a violation of election-related duties." The board voted 4-1 that the threshold had not been met. One Democrat voted with the Republican majority, though she lectured Thompson: "We're cautioned not to bring politics into the polling place, and discussions of politics. At least one of those instances cited in the complaints is arguably a political commentary, or brings in issues that really have no place in a polling place.” But she agreed to let him off the hook.

Republican SBOE member Stacy "Four" Eggers did give Thompson a highly decorous, because indirect dressing-down:

"Mr. Chairman, I think it is worth cautioning the chair [Thompson] as to his discussions, choice of words and what he chooses to discuss at the polling place. I know that Miss [Angela] Hawkins [another Jackson Co. board member] and I both have spent a lot of time in county precincts, and generally the discussion is limited to the weather, or perhaps your favorite sports team or something innocuous like that.

“Although the comments were not appropriate for the discussion in the area, they still, in my mind, don't show a violation of Chapter 163.” 

I suspect this may not be the last dressing-down that Bill Thompson will be needing.

 

Cornyn Shoots the Moon in Texas

 

Holy mackerel! I just saw this commercial attacking Ken Paxton, paid for by a proud Senator John Cornyn. Talk about a frontal assault! That's how mean and personal the Republican Senate primary run-off has gotten in Texas between the bland Senator Cornyn and the poisonous Attorney General Ken Paxton. Cornyn, not so bland after all. He's had to go very negative after Trump failed to endorse him, which according to the entire world of political punditry, Trump promised he would do -- to save Texas from born-again James Talarico, because most Texas Republican operatives think Paxton's baggage is as deadly as a suppressed sulfur fart. The very heavy ethical baggage that Cornyn has just aired in this minute commercial.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Let Us Sit Upon the Ground and Tell Sad Stories of the Death of Kings

 

Politicians abhor a vacuum as much as nature does, and the sudden concession of NC Senate President Phil Berger late yesterday afternoon has created one of the biggest vacuums in North Carolina history. Berger had ultimate power over every bill that made it through to a vote, every appointment to every important post that the General Assembly controls, every ambition of every fellow Republican senator who wanted to rise. Berger was the undisputed king, and perhaps no one will celebrate his absence more than some of his own allies.

The resentment of putative allies got a surprise airing yesterday in the New York Times, when reporter Eduardo Medina outed Sen. Thom Tillis for secretly lobbying wealthy Republican donors against Berger. On a Zoom call last month, well before the primary, Thom Tillis was clear that Berger had to go because he's too power-hungry, too authoritarian, too dismissive of any idea not his own, and too already fat with campaign cash.

So I can only imagine the ambitions right now surging through the Berger troops still in the Senate, the ones who could not rise because Berger stood in the way. The rivalries will now show themselves in the Raleigh Thunderdome. And all the while the in-fighting goes on and consumes the Republican ecology, the date of the mid-term reckoning with voters advances apace. Who knows? Voters appear quite irritated with abusers of power, and perhaps all the GOP's corrupt gerrymandering may not be shield enough against the wrath to come.

Meanwhile, Sam Page can take his seat in January as a new back-bencher -- he may need two seats to accommodate that ridiculous chapeau. He'll soon learn that his vote has been pre-programmed by higher ups (and probably doesn't matter anyway, if the Republican super-majority holds. Ha!). What High Sheriff Sam Page doesn't know about being low-man in a new pecking order might possibly be a harsh and disappointing education.

 

Kings of Gambling Mean To Own North Carolina

 

 

The gambling industry has a two-prong strategy for taking North Carolina: First, the push stage-managed by the Phil Berger clan to put a physical gambling casino in Rockingham County (and ultimately in three other rural counties). The money trail in that mis-fire went back to The Cordish Company, a developer of "gaming destinations."

The second hustle is all about online gambling. The leading player looking for favors is the corporate entity known as DraftKings, a huge online gambling industry leader with a very eerie website that put me in mind of actually being inside a windowless but gleaming casino, slowly losing my wits. DraftKings' parent is DK Crown Holdings Inc., "a leading digital sports entertainment provider." They recently turned up in an investigative piece into a key race for the NC Senate, sticking their thumb on the scale to oust incumbent Republican Sen. Chris Measmer in NCS 34 and put in Republican Kevin Crutchfield (who was recently a one-term member of the NC House). Crutchfield won the primary even after news came out that DK Crown Holdings Inc. was behind big donations to super-PACS that opened a ridiculous frontal assault on the character of Chris Measmer (ridiculous because they attacked him as a RINO when he's in actuality pretty MAGAfied). (Measmer was already trailing heavy personal baggage, which I described back in February.)

Crutchfield

 

The anti-Measmer attack ads were funded by an entity called the American Conservative Fund. According to the excellent investigative reporting of Nora O'Neill, "the Federal Election Commission filings show American Conservative Fund is funded entirely by another political group called Win for America, which is entirely funded by DK Crown Holdings, Inc."

They wanted Chris Measmer to lose his seat bad, which means they wanted Kevin Crutchfield bad and are counting on him for ... what? That question alone ought to set Kevin Crutchfield up for knocking down in November by Democrat April Cook. I wrote about her back in February and was taken with her prospects. She's now been endorsed by Carolina Forward. She can beat Crutchfield, who's now dragging his own weary baggage.

Anyway, why such financial interest in little ole North Carolina by various fronts in the gambling biz? (And I do wonder what other General Assembly races featured big gambling money.) In the case of DraftKings, its very popular and I suspect amazingly lucrative SportsBook only very recently became legal (March of '24) after the passage of H 347, which legalized sports betting specifically but not "casino" action -- slots, roulette, and other live-dealer games, which according to DraftKings' website they're very into. Online casino betting -- still banned in North Carolina, but the General Assembly already opened that door a crack and invited DraftKings in.

 

Splitsville in the Democratic Party?

 

Wesley Knott

 

 

The dyspepsia in the Democratic Party is generational. I see the rising tide of younger, sharper, more confrontational candidates as the yeast producing the gas that makes the dough rise, and my sympathies are almost entirely with them. I was pretty yeasty myself in my youth and had Bobby Kennedy and Eugene McCarthy to inspire me (not that McCarthy was any spring chicken by then, but he didn't think like an old man).

So I'm fairly philosophical about the kerfuffle that's erupted in the Wake County Democratic Party over the party chair's open and public endorsement of the insurgent Nida Allam, the 32-year-old Durham County Commissioner, over the "safer" incumbent Congresswoman Valerie Foushee. Endorsements in party primaries are supposed to be off-limits for party officers, and some county parties adhere rigidly to that hands-off principle (like the Watauga County Democratic Party, sometimes to its actual detriment). What party officers are not supposed to indulge in, individual rank-and-file Democrats can. Any Democrat can advocate for whomever they favor, loudly and obnoxiously if necessary.

But here's the thing: that principle of non-interference by our party leaders is already in tatters. The Governor himself made very public endorsements in more than one primary for General Assembly seats (and his candidates all won), while the state party chair cut off campaign resources for several NC House members who had voted with Republicans on veto overrides (and all those candidates lost). So I'm almost amused to see a petition arise in Wake County to eject Wesley Knott from his position as party chair, because he endorsed Nida Allam over Valerie Foushee in the 4th Congressional District primary. When asked about his coloring outside the lines, Knott, a 29-year-old who just became party chair last year, articulated the generational judgment of Foushee, the 70-year-old political veteran with municipal, county, and General Assembly elected positions behind her and a history of taking AIPAC money (the Israeli lobby). Knott called Foushee “risk-averse,” a “carefully-calculated” friend of the status quo who has failed to inspire voters. 

"Risk aversion" cuts succinctly to the point. In the current situation of both the NC General Assembly and the US Congress, where Trump Republicans rule and in NC's case rule almost absolutely, some Democrats become hesitant to advance ideas or initiatives that they know can't win approval (because, math) and they become simultaneously resigned if not outright comfortable sitting on their small seats of advancement and doing nothing to raise hell for policies that make sense and that need public drum-beating. Wesley Knott is a drum-beater.

I wrote about the younger version of Wesley Knott in 2022 when he himself ran a primary against Democratic House incumbent Sarah Crawford in NC House Dist. 66 and came within 140 votes of actually beating her. I was impressed then by the way he put things:

"I’m a mixed-race progressive who grew up in the Deep South. Politics isn’t abstract to me. I didn’t need critical race theory to learn about racism, and I didn’t need a policy analysis to know the importance of Medicaid. So when I talk about policy, it’s from a place of shared experience. I know what’s on the line. That’s why I’m running."

 

To get rid of Wesley Knott, who by other accounts has been an effective ball of fire for the Wake County party, strikes me as a foolish cutting off of one's nose to spit one's face.

 

Keeping Up With the Slow Death of Titan

 

I always learn stuff from Bryan Anderson's reporting, like the basic statutory process for recounting votes in the Berger/Page upset election in NC Senate Dist. 26:

State law and historical precedent calls for a machine recount first. After that, the trailing candidate has 24 hours to request a partial hand recount for a random sample of about 3% of primary day precincts, early voting sites, or both. If the partial hand recount produces results that indicate a different outcome in the race, a full hand recount would be triggered.

 

Yesterday (Wednesday), Berger asked the State Board of Elections (SBOE -- majority Republican) to alter that schedule slightly, to also do a hand recount on any ballots that the machine recount identified as "undervotes" (where voters picked no candidate in the race) or "overvotes" (where voters picked both candidates). Those numbers are already known: 217 undervotes and 3 overvotes out of the 26,000 votes cast in Rockingham and Guilford counties. 

 

Berger wanted yesterday those 220 ballots examined during the machine recount. The SBOE declined Berger's request, perhaps because those three Republican SBOE members are quite aware that the whole state is watching them very closely in this particular instance, on high alert for any finagling. So SBOE Chair Francis DeLuca (as dependably and consistently partisan a conservative as any GOP wet-dream could conjure and put in control of North Carolina elections) sounded like a slightly shocked Aunt Polly about Berger's request: “We follow the law! If it’s in the statute, we follow it. But there was nothing in that request that went by statute.” 

Berger intends ultimately (and mysteriously) to "determine the voter's intent" behind those 220 undervotes and overvotes, and I reckon those assumed intentions end up being at least one of the arguments in the eventual law suit. Berger only needs to find 24 of those under-voters and get them to swear in an affidavit that their votes would have/should have gone to Berger. If I were one of those people, I would play it safe and claim that I was on prescription drugs that day and didn't mean to skip that race and would have voted enthusiastically for Mr. Berger had I not been in a not-unpleasing drug haze). 

 

The machine recount in Rockingham is happening right now at this hour. The machine recount in those precincts of Guilford that are in S 26 happened yesterday, resulted in minus-1 vote from both Berger and Page, so no change in the outcome. All eyes on Rockingham today.

Ain't No Simple Thing To Steal an Election

 

BREAKING NEWS from Laura Leslie: 

North Carolina Senate Leader Phil Berger (R-Rockingham) has called for a recount in his District 26 primary contest against Rockingham Sheriff Sam Page, who holds a narrow lead in official county totals.

According to the final canvasses in Rockingham and Guilford counties last week, with 26,249 votes cast in the race, Page has 23 more votes than Berger, a margin of 0.08%. That’s well within the 1% margin in state law for a losing candidate in a non-statewide race to request a recount....

Because the district covers more than one county, the State Board of Elections has jurisdiction over the recount process, but the actual recounts are still conducted at the county level. The state board sent detailed instructions to Guilford and Rockingham counties on March 14. 

 

I'm not normally (yip!) conspiracy-minded, but in an age when massive theft is on plain view and actually unashamed to be seen in its native garb, if there was a moment for election theft, it would be now rather than later. And don't you wonder what those "detailed instrux" said? 

It's a machine recount, but in both Rockingham and Guilford, there's a paper-trail. Voters fill in a paper ballot that they then feed into a tabulator (Rockingham County uses the DS200 Vote Tabulator). Could the innards of the DS200 be jiggered to flip the election? Dunno, but I bet it would be hard, but totally within the skill set of the people who run elections now and who owe their jobs to Phil Berger. Just sayin'.

But even then, any substantial change in vote totals from the machine recount would trigger a second hand-eye recount, and that's when those paper ballots would presumably furnish the truth. 

What Would Mark Twain Say about Donald Jethro Trump?

 

I've been reading and savoring Ron Chernow's new and massive biography of Mark Twain. The book's so fat and heavy it's made reading in bed, which I favor, almost impossible. Dropping the book on my face could be fatal, or at least disfiguring.

Mark Twain was a complex, sometimes infuriating, easily duped genius. He made many disastrous business alliances based on misplaced trust in men who were essentially conning him for his money, so it's tempting to think he might have been taken in by the orange bunco artist, but ... naw ... Mark Twain was too genetically alert to pompous windbaggery and loved deflating it. After all, it was Mark Twain who coined the defining term for the times -- "the Gilded Age" -- and attacked the robber barons savagely.

I found this passage in Chernow's book most enlightening for understanding Mark Twain's politics and for guessing how he would have viewed Jethro in the White House:

After campaigning for Rutherford B. Hayes in the 1876 and James Garfield in the 1880 presidential races, Mark Twain seemed, at least outwardly, to have become a stalwart of the Republican Party .... But, an iconoclast to the core, he was not cut out for strict party allegiance, telling a reporter between those two elections: "I am neither a Republican nor a Democrat -- for any length of time. Vacillation is my particular forte." He identified with the Liberal Republican wing of the party, which detested political bosses, favored civil service reform and free trade, and endorsed clean government. These Republicans stressed morality rather than ideology in political matters and clung to the belief that character was the foremost criterion for public office, not a candidate's partisan agenda. 

Needless to remind readers that both the Democratic and the Republican parties of the 1880s were very different animals than they are now. The Democratic Party was harbor for white supremacists who either excused slavery or actively defended it. The Republican Party was the party of Lincoln and on the whole the liberals of their day. 

Mark Twain was born essentially a Southerner in Missouri, in a family -- let alone a region -- where slavery was the practice, never seriously questioned after the Missouri Compromise of 1820. The future writer's own father owned at least one slave, but Mark Twain was bright enough to see the humanity in people of all stations and conditions. After all, he created the character Jim, the runaway slave that Huck Finn teams up with and who is the noblest character in that book. Huckleberry Finn was banned all over the South because of its dangerous liberalism (and then -- different story -- it got banned all over again in the North in recent years because of its dangerous use of the n-word, and thereby hangs the alluring and sweetly stuffed pinata of opinion about how most white men, even one as smart as Mark Twain, will never be completely shed of their racism). 

Mark Twain's transformation into a Yankee Republican did not kick into high gear until he married a rich Connecticut girl from an abolitionist family. He always wanted to please Olivia, and she ruled him (at least while he was at home). He even gave up his whiskey and 15-cigars-a-day habits when he and Olivia first set up housekeeping, but that abstemiousness didn't last. He once admitted to a friend that he couldn't write without a cigar in his hand to steady his concentration. So seems pretty obvious that his "liberal" attitude toward Blacks after the Civil War was maybe also strategically cosmetic, to please the wife he loved and doted on, and that he was always essentially just a rough country boy who used the n-word without thought or -- in fact -- ill will. 

I like complicated people.

 

The Interesting Political Climate of 2026

 

The closeness of the Phil Berger/Sam Page race is a reminder that, even in an era of nationalized politics, state legislative primaries can still turn on local dynamics. Relationships and local turnout patterns—what political scientist V.O. Key once called “friends and neighbors voting”—still matter, and occasionally they decide who holds power.

--Christopher Cooper, Old North State Politics

 

 

Sam Page, currently 23 votes ahead

 

 

The fact that Phil Berger couldn't win even with the Trump endorsement -- that he couldn't nationalize his importance to the voters of NC Senate Dist. 26 by tying himself to the Trump -- suggests to me that the MAGA base -- at least, portions of it, particularly in rural areas -- are actively trying to look away from Trump like you might drop your eyes or turn away your head when you see your friend embarrassing himself. Country people are always embarrassed for the swaggering braggarts in their own families. So a local candidate tied to what is in so many countless ways a walking ineptitude was of no particular help to Phil Berger on March 3rd. His obvious corruption in trying to force a gambling casino on the good Christians of Rockingham County brought him down. Trump couldn't save him because Trump is now a spectacle of badly staged policy swerves. War? Poorly calculated distractions featuring bad and un-capable people, even though the Noem woman is gone.

 

The lesson for Democrats might be: Find the local, fly the local flag, defend the local. Don't forget that the biggest local issue might, in fact, be the Republican incumbent's own character, his/her votes, his/her trumpian odor, his/her public corruption for the sake of power.

 

The Cowboy Calf-Ropes the Leader of the Pack

 

Sam Page, March 3, 2026. Photo Bryan Anderson

 

 

That sharp tack Jeffrey Billman, the best investigative reporter in the state IMO, has just published a deep primer on Phil Berger* and how the President Pro Tem of the NC Senate got himself into such career-ending trouble with the voters of Rockingham County, who have voted Berger out and replaced him with the county's high sheriff and drugstore cowboy Sam Page.

Billman recounts the entire career, the scandals we've read about and partially misremembered, the iron grip on policy-making in the NC Senate, that paint a portrait of a stunning level of political corruption. And some new factoids I had previously missed:

The Assembly reported in August that, months after Illinois-based RedSpeed deposited $220,000 into House and Senate Republican coffers, lawmakers passed a bill that could make the company millions. The News & Observer reported in October that lawmakers spent $15 million to help a Mooresville developer after his politically connected project manager donated $132,000 to key lawmakers, including more than $17,000 to Berger. 

When you control as much as the Berger family controls, you're never satisfied. And it's like Phil Berger foresaw a time when he'd need to control the vote-counting process itself:

After the 2024 election, Republicans tucked a provision into a disaster recovery bill that transferred control of the state elections board from the Democratic governor to the newly elected Republican state auditor. 

The auditor, Dave Boliek, appointed the local and state officials who would oversee a recount. Boliek also endorsed and campaigned for Berger, and his chief of staff and spokesperson previously worked for Berger in the General Assembly. 

Boliek, a turn-coat Democrat, has already refused Sam Page's demand that he recuse himself from any recount process.

 

* If you're not a subscriber to The Assembly, what in the world is the matter with you?

 

The Perils of Phileen

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Dennis Draughon is on Bluesky. 

 

Primarily (Dragging My Ass)

 

Keith Kidwell

 

 

My excuse for not being johnny-on-the-spot about what just happened in North Carolina and then Texas yesterday -- I couldn't research nor write anything about that amazing primary primarily because my laptop was in the hospital getting updates and add-ons.

The first thing of note locally came to my attention a couple of days ahead of E-Day, and this local trend turns out to have been true and steady throughout the state. This info goes under the heading, "Enthusiasm Gap":

Some more quick numbers: Watauga County compared to statewide in early voting through yesterday (Friday):

 

-- Statewide 42% cast a Republican ballot during early voting. In Watauga only 25% cast a Republican ballot.

-- Statewide 29% of voters were Republicans. In Watauga 17% were Republicans.

 

Youth vote (18-30) represents 19% of the early vote in this Primary election. That is a significant increase from 11% in 2022 Primary.  

The enthusiasm gap means different things to the two major parties. For the Democrats, enthusiasm seems particularly generational in its vision of the future -- young people are showing up as serious candidates and some of them outstandingly have prospered, and because the future looks both younger and more progressive, candidates out-of-step with the majority are no longer tolerated. Carla Cunningham, Nasif Majeed, Shelly Willingham -- those three Democrats had voted with the GOP to override Gov. Stein vetoes, and all went down to defeat in their primaries. Michael Wray, a former Dem House Member who made a habit of defying both Gov. Cooper and his caucus, lost his bid to take back the seat he lost in 2024 from the man who beat him.

What does the apparent lack of enthusiasm mean for Republicans? You tell me. The main connective thread I see is possibly just a sudden surge of hatred for encumbents of whatever stripe, for both mean-eyed old Keith Kidwell, head of the NC House Freedom Caucus; and a Phil Berger, a corporate establishmentarian if I've ever seen one, who's in it for himself and his brazen family. Somehow 2026 has turned into a dismal year for Republican honchos. Someone soon will have calculated just how much each vote cost Phil Berger and his web of big money. I see totals calculated above $10 million. Berger got just a third of the votes in his home county of Rockingham -- that's worse than what Virginia Foxx's home county thinks of her -- while it was the portion of gerrymandered Guilford in his newly drawn district that got him within two votes of actually tying Sam Page. Oh the humiliation.

Colin Campbell lists at least four more Republican incumbents, some with longish records, who didn't survive their primaries. Why? I would love to hear informed opinions.

And meanwhile, Texas was almost feverish with heat.

More later (but I have to tell you, Brethren, I'm outside in the garden most of the time).