I recently read on an Art Pope-sponsored website a long essay by AppState history professor Michael Behrent, who also until recently served as the Democratic Chair of the Watauga County Board of Elections. (He says he's no longer a registered Democrat.) Behrent begins his essay hypothesizing about something that only a bonehead first-year teacher would try, "overt campaigning in the classroom." While I certainly agree that overt political campaigning in the classroom is wrong, Behrent makes a dark and sinister suggestion that "some political organizations have found workarounds to avoid these prohibitions, allowing them to promote their interests in taxpayer-funded educational contexts."
That's the heart of Behrent's argument -- nefarious "workarounds" are subverting the will of the General Assembly.
"Workarounds"
That word needs unpacking. Behrent seems to be implying that "overt campaigning" is in fact happening regularly, especially on the campus of AppState. His main piece of evidence ... well, I'll let him tell it:
On Wednesday, August 27, I received an email that seemed to have been blind copied to other Appalachian State faculty, as well. It was sent from an App State email address to my App State email address. The sender identified himself as a student “volunteer” for the Watauga County Voting Rights Task Force, which he described as “a local nonpartisan organization fighting for every person’s ability and right to vote” (italics in original). The student noted, “We do not engage with candidates or political issues.” He requested permission to visit my class—and those of other faculty to whom the email was sent—to discuss how to register to vote. The email said: “We understand your time is limited, so we only ask for five minutes at the beginning or end of your class. If you would like to invite one of our representatives for a brief presentation, please respond with the location, and preferred date and time for our visit.”
Behrent makes a big deal out of that email and its student author, but I don't see any "overt campaigning" in it. The Watauga County Voting Rights Task Force (WCVRTF) has always presented voter registrations as a strictly non-partisan, informational activity to ensure proper registrations that will count on E-Day. The Task Force registers everyone, of whatever party. The greater bulk of their registrations are "Unaffiliated," with a few Democrats, a few Republicans, and some Libertarians. What's wrong with that? And what's wrong with that student's emailed and open request, to legally and ethically and according to IRS rules do non-partisan voter registration in a classroom? Show me the "overt campaigning." To equate voter registration efforts with partisan campaigning is ridiculous on its face.
Behrent takes a leap of several furlongs, alleging that the "workarounds" are discoverable in that poor student's associations with other people. It's quite the Easter egg of guilt -- that the several people who started the WCVRTF are -- or were -- also active in the Democratic Party. And Behrent is right about that, but so what? The Voting Rights Task Force was originally a committee in the Party, focused on voter registration. The committee eventually spun itself off from the Party as a separate non-profit, barred by IRS rules from "overt campaigning." The Task Force promotes ballot-access for every voter and defends the provisional ballot, and has gone to bat for the rights of legally registered voters who go to the wrong precinct on election day. The Task Force won a lawsuit restoring the polling place in the AppState Student Union. More recently it went to court again and won a case to give due process to voters whose legitimate voter registration forms had clerical errors which disenfranchised them. The Task Force is also a co-plaintiff with NC Common Cause, seeking to overturn the Ralph Hise gerrymander of Watauga's CoCommish and school board districts.
Bottomline: A person can be legally, ethically, morally involved in more than one org at a time (or else the world is going to be short a lot of the volunteers who actually make things happen). Nowhere does Behrent offer a single instance of a classroom breach, when "overt campaigning" occurred, or of any actual breaking of the rules. Not one. It's all innuendo and those suspicious associations. Democrats doing democratic things while wearing different hats and following different rules. Behrent build a straw horse, imagining a bunch of political activists who (he says) give away their game on the WCVRTF website by quoting liberal icon Lyndon Johnson on the supreme importance of the vote, while editing the original quote to eliminate the word man. (The Pope universe loves this kind of "outing" of liberal stupidities, and Behrent makes hay out of it.)
Behrent's guilt-by-association tour eventually gets to my own household, to PamsPicks.net, and the whole progressive nest of plugged-in citizens who sometimes do voter registration for the WCVRTF and then sometimes do activities for the Democratic Party and who know how to keep things separate. For the record, PamsPicks.net is not published as an arm of the Task Force nor of the Democratic Party. It's an independent source of information and candidate endorsements that often infuriates Democrats as much as Republicans. Behrent gets this right:
“Pam’s Picks” is the brainchild of a Watauga County activist, who for years has regularly provided extensive information about local, state, and national candidates in addition to making endorsements in most races. “Pam’s Picks” typically includes a marked-up sample ballot with her endorsements noted, which voters may take with them to the polls. A January 2023 article from The Appalachian, the App State student newspaper, quotes the author of “Pam’s Picks”: “I am a progressive Watauga resident and have long held interest in local politics and issues.” The same article notes that, in the 2020 Democratic primary, a candidate who received less than 10 percent statewide called the author of “Pam’s Picks,” puzzled that he had won Watauga. “Pam” explained: “Well, I got your story out.”
So what's Behrent's beef? That an independent woman -- not ever a Democratic Party officer but a self-starting volunteer who has quite separately built a following for her "Picks," because she does thorough research on every candidate of whatever party, offering background facts and social media links, and endorses according to her admittedly "progressive" political values. What's his problem with that?
His essay smells like burnt sugar.
