|Chief Justice Paul Newby,
doing his happy dance
The five Republican operatives will rehear those cases quickly, next month, because they need for people to forget about this naked abuse of power before 2024.
The majority’s order fails to acknowledge the radical break with 205 years of history that the decision to rehear this case represents. It has long been the practice of this Court to respect precedent and the principle that once the Court has ruled, that ruling will not be disturbed merely because of a change in the Court’s composition.
That what Justice Anita Earls wrote in her dissent.