Remember Paul Foley?

Paul Foley was the Winston-Salem lawyer who -- while also a newly appointed member of the state Board of Elections (BOE) -- colluded in 2013 with Stacy C. "Four" Eggers in trying to shut down all polling on the Appalachian State University campus. Foley was later ousted from the SBOE by Governor McCrory over another conflict of interest problem.

So what's Paul Foley up to these days?

Senate leader Phil Berger had slipped Foley's name into Senate Bill 694, which is being considered this week in a special session in Raleigh. According to language that Berger inserted, Foley was to serve out the unexpired term of Dan Barrett on the State Human Resources Commission, serving until June 30, 2021.

The Winston-Salem Journal began asking questions, and presto! change-o! Phil Berger's office suddenly discovered that “that name was included by mistake and will be removed when the bill is heard in committee later this afternoon.”

Republican County Commissioners Come Unglued

Stella Anderson, the lone Democrat on the Watauga Board of Elections (BOE), appeared before the County Commission last night and requested that Stacy C. Eggers IV ("Four") be relieved of his duty as counsel to the BOE and that another attorney be found to advise the board. Anderson's reasons included the thoroughly partisan nature of Four Eggers' involvement with the BOE and a pattern of misrepresentation or manipulation of election law for partisan Republican advantage.

The Republicans on the Commish starting yelling, particularly the two Republicans up for reelection, Perry Yates and David Blust. The bottom-line: These guys want everyone to know that they're perfectly happy with the activities of Four Eggers, and they intend to cling to him, even as the ship goes down.

Commissioner Perry Yates accused Anderson of impugning Four Eggers' reputation. I believe the Winston-Salem Journal, in a front-page investigation in 2013, beat Anderson to that punch. As did the revelation of emails between Four Eggers and then State Board of Elections member Paul Foley, which revealed the behind-the-scenes scheming and manipulation of the county attorney.

Commissioner David Blust was all righteous indignation: I have never tried to suppress the votes of anyone! But for the record, here he is, on video, telling AppState students directly that he did not think they had any right to vote in local elections, in which he was running at the time:



Since our county government intends to protect Four Eggers at all costs, it will take the voters to change county government, at which point Four Eggers will be history.

Wake DA Reopens Pay-to-Play Investigation of Video Sweepstakes Donors

"Some members of the five-member Board of Elections expressed frustrations that campaign finance laws were insufficient to cover what might be other criminal violations. They noted records showed millions of dollars moving through Burns’ personal and business accounts, and subsequent payments and political contributions in North Carolina." N&O, yesterday

Kim Strach, Executive Director at the NC State Board of Elections (SBOE), spent two years exonerating North Carolina politicians who took $274,000 from Chase Burns and his wife, the convicted owners of sweepstakes gambling operations. Much of that money went to Governor McCrory and other Republican leaders who could have theoretically helped out Burns by overturning NC's ban on sweepstakes gambling. (The SBOE looked at a total of some $700,000 in
questionable spending" by Burns in 2012.) The politicians took the money, but they didn't overturn the ban.

"Though the elections board did not refer the report for prosecution, members made it clear that the board’s scope and legal tools were limited and that there could be room for a deeper look."

The Wake District Attorney has decided to take that deeper look:

...Strach said her investigation was unable to determine if illegal money from Burns flowed into North Carolina. State investigators were not able to interview Burns, nor obtain his federal tax records.

Some members of the five-member Board of Elections expressed frustrations that campaign finance laws were insufficient to cover what might be other criminal violations. They noted records showed millions of dollars moving through Burns’ personal and business accounts, and subsequent payments and political contributions in North Carolina.

"Millions."

Kim Strach's investigation did collect one political pelt: SBOE member Paul Foley was forced to resign in disgrace after it was revealed that his Winston-Salem law firm also represented Chase Burns. So there's that.

SBOE Deals With Watauga ... Again!

Notorious Aceto & Eggers
Photo by Lonnie Webster

This coming Friday in Raleigh, the NC State Board of Elections will consider the challenge to the Watauga County Board of Elections' Early Voting plan, passed last month by the notorious Luke Eggers/Bill Aceto. Democratic member of the Watauga BOE, Stella Anderson, will present her alternative Early Voting plan to the SBOE, which actually honors the requests of the towns of Blowing Rock and Boone to establish satellite sites, at those towns' expense.

The notorious Eggers/Aceto pod refused those requests, because they (i.e., Stacy C. Eggers IV -- the even more notorious "Four" Eggers) are desperate to prevent any Appalachian State University Early Voting site as a precedent for 2016, when so much of the Republican agenda will be at stake.

With the most notorious of all Paul Foley gone from the SBOE, and a new dude being sworn in to his seat on Friday, there's no telling what might happen.

How Much Does a Seat on the State Board of Elections Cost?

Foley

Paul Foley raised some substantial money for candidate Pat McCrory in 2012, hosting a fundraiser for the future governor and then pretty soon after that getting his appointment from McCrory to the state Board of Elections (SBOE).

McCrory has since been distancing himself from Foley, whom he forced to resign from the SBOE earlier this month, saying he didn't know Foley. Yet McCrory was present at the Foley fundraiser and posed for photographs with many of the donors in attendance. Foley presented the McCrory campaign with a bill for expenses and got reimbursed over $1,600 ($1,500 of that for the bar tab).

Under the circumstances, it would be so easy -- and so obviously human -- to forget your host and major benefactor.

This started out to be about the dirty gambling money sprayed around the North Carolina political world in 2012 by internet sweepstakes mogul Chase Burns. Now it's also about the cover-up.

Paul Foley Has Resigned from the State Board of Elections; What's Next?

Approximately nine hours after declaring he would not resign, despite the governor's promise to remove him for malfeasance, State Board of Elections member Paul Foley told Board Chair Josh Howard he was resigning "to avoid distractions from the important work of the board." Foley was apparently holding out/negotiating an exit that seemed to exonerate him from all wrong-doing. About midnight, Howard sent out the announcement that Foley had resigned, adding this:

There has been no finding of wrongdoing by Mr. Foley, and the report we requested from the Attorney General found no improper influence by Mr. Foley over the outcome of the board's efforts in the matter of Chase Burns....

What that saving-of-face statement didn't address was the presumption among many of us that Foley was never really trying to influence the investigation but merely trying to get useful intel he could productively pass on to his partners at Kilpatrick Townsend, who were defending Burns.

Howard's trying to save Foley for a future leadership role in the NC Republican Party?

Hasan Harnett

New NCGOP Chair Hasan Harnett must submit three names to the governor as possible replacements for Foley. There's no reason to expect a moderating change of direction from Harnett, a tea partier who is said to be bent on purging "moderate" Republicans from other boards of elections around the state.

Plus Harnett's recent press conference in Winston-Salem accusing Rev. William Barber of being paid by labor unions and the thousands of Moral Monday protestors of being paid outside agitators does not inspire confidence in his judgment.

Either the Republican-dominated state Board of Elections can begin to rebuild its severely damaged reputation in the state, or it can continue down this hyper-partisan path toward destroying everyone's faith in fair, free, and honest elections.

McCrory Asking for Foley's Resignation

This appeared on Instagram around 4:30 this afternoon:

BREAKING : gov McCrory says he wants NCSBE board member Paul Foley to remove himself

UPDATE:
Then this appeared on Instagram:

FOLEY REMOVAL: gov explains why he can remove Foley

Apparently, Mr. Foley ain't going quietly.

MORE
The N&O has full coverage. Foley's gonna fight it. His statement is revealing.

Paul Foley & Four Eggers, Sitting in a Tree...

Paul Foley, email pal with...

The following investigative piece about what went down in Watauga County during 2014 flashed on the Associated Press wire earlier this evening and suggests a burning question: How many conflicts of interest can state Board of Elections member Paul Foley stand to have revealed before he does the right thing and resigns his seat?

This is all old news to us in Watauga, at least those of us involved in the struggle to stop the suppression of the ASU student vote. It's not been common knowledge, we guess, among the pooh-bahs in Raleigh, but we now welcome their gaze in our direction. Because ... shit has been going on up here in the mountains!

Emails: NC board member involved in disputed

...Stacy Eggers IV

voting plan

RALEIGH, N.C. (AP) — A Republican member of the North Carolina elections board worked closely with local officials in their effort to eliminate a heavily Democratic voting site, a plan a judge ruled was intended to suppress voter turnout, according to hundreds of emails reviewed by The Associated Press.

The state Board of Elections is supposed to act as a neutral arbiter when policy disputes arise involving county elections boards. The emails show that Paul J. Foley worked closely behind the scenes with GOP officials in Watauga County as they crafted a plan to eliminate the early voting site at Appalachian State University.

Foley is already under scrutiny for failing to recuse himself for 17 months from the state election agency's investigation into political donations from an Oklahoma sweepstakes mogul represented by his law firm. He recused himself only after staff learned the mogul had paid nearly $1.3 million to his firm. Details of that investigation are to be released Wednesday.

The emails between Foley and Republican officials in Watauga discussing the removal of the longstanding Appalachian State voting site were provided to AP by Pam Williamson, a Democrat who was among those who successfully sued to keep the location open for the 2014 election. She received the emails following a public records request, and the state elections board confirmed their authenticity.

"Foley was right in the middle, advising GOP movers and shakers in our county to move forward with the plan," she said. "It's our contention that things were decided before the board met."

Foley, a lawyer for the state Republican Party appointed by Gov. Pat McCrory to the state elections board in 2013, declined an interview request and did not respond to emailed questions.

Voting laws have come under scrutiny in North Carolina since the Republican-led legislature passed a sweeping election law in 2013 that in part reduced early voting and ended same-day registration.

The Watauga conflict originated when the local board's two Republicans and one Democrat couldn't agree on the early-voting plan. The state board stepped in and voted to support the county board's Republicans in their plan to eliminate the on-campus voting site.

Seven county voters sued, saying the plan burdened younger voters. A state superior court judge agreed, saying the closure was to "discourage student voting."

The lawsuit contended Foley's "continual collaboration" with Stacy Eggers IV, the Watauga County government attorney and a former local elections board member, revealed a "partisan motive" behind the action.

Their correspondence, reviewed by AP, frequently refers to "the opposition" and "the other side."

In early August, 2013, as a new county board with a Republican majority was about to be sworn in, Eggers asked Foley to examine proposals he expected would pass, including removing the early voting site from the university's Plemmons Student Union.

That was the county's only early voting site to vote Democrat in the 2008 and 2012 presidential election and the 2012 governor's race. Eggers said he wanted Foley to vet the plan because "it would be embarrassing" if state elections officials overturned it.

In an August 8, 2013 email, Foley responded that "unless something is out of whack with reality, then I don't think it is likely for the State Board to have any issues with it."

Foley spoke in favor of the plan before the state board and did not mention his involvement. The board voted 4-1 in favor of upholding it.

Chuck Winfree, a Greensboro Republican who served on the state board until 2013, said it is not unusual for a board member to communicate with local officials about various issues. But, he said, Foley should have told his fellow board members the level of his involvement and potentially recused himself.

"The last thing you want if you're a lawyer or a party before the board is for someone to have an agenda you don't know about," he said. "It would be hard to say you've gotten a fair hearing, and that would undermine the credibility of the board."

N&O Editorial Calls for Paul Foley To Resign From SBOE

One curious omission from the News&Observer's editorial RE the conflict of interest problem for Paul Foley in the investigation of Chase Burns' political contributions....

The N&O editorial mentions that Foley recused himself from the investigation into Burns but fails to note that the "recusal" didn't last. According to the memorandum that SBOE Executive Director Kim Strach wrote on October 10, Foley continued to press SBOE staff for details about the investigation and demanded an advance copy of the findings.

Those "findings" are supposed to be released by Kim Strach tomorrow at a press conference in Raleigh. We're all ears.

Meanwhile, just for the "conflict-of-interest" file we're sure you're keeping on your laptop, Kim Strach's hubby, Phil Strach, in one of the attorneys defending voter suppression in that federal courtroom in Winston-Salem this week. Strach and Foley both served the NC Republican Party as general counsels.

Paul Foley, far left (partly obscured). Phil Strach, 4th from right on
the dais (seated)

Key Documents in the Paul Foley/Chase Burns Nexus

Here are the key documents in the unfolding story about whether State Board of Elections member Paul Foley was funneling details about the State Board of Elections investigation into campaign contributions made to dozens of NC politicians by internet gambling mogul Chase Burns:

1. June 23, 2015, report on the investigation of Mr. Foley's activities by Senior Deputy Attorney General Alexander McC. Peters

2. Oct. 8, 2014, memo "Pending Investigation and Potential Conflict of Interest," from Kim Strach (Exec. Dir., SBOE) to Josh Howard (Chair, SBOE)

3. April 19, 2013, original complaint filed by Democracy North Carolina, calling for an SBOE investigation into campaign contributions by Chase Burns and his wife

4. March 26, 2013, Democracy North Carolina press release, "McCrory Got $70,000 from Donors Tied to Sweepstakes Gambling, Including Another Operator Arrested in Florida Scandal"

5. March 18, 2013, Democracy North Carolina press release, "Sweepstakes Gambling Operator Is Top Donor to NC Legislators; Donations with Ties to McCrory's Law Firm Raise Questions"

6. September 29, 2014, memorandum from Paul Foley to Kim Strach, recusing himself from the Chase Burns investigation

7. September 29, 2014, "CONFIDENTIAL" memo from Kim Strach to Josh Howard, "Possible conflict involving an ongoing investigation into Chase Burns and International Internet Technologies, LLC"

8. October 10, 2014, memo from Kim Strach to Josh Howard, reporting that, despite his official "recusal" from the Chase Burns investigation, Paul Foley is continuing to ask questions and demand an advance copy of the investigative report before it is made public

No Comment

Donald Trump with NC SBOE member Paul J. Foley

What We Know So Far About State Board of Elections Member Paul Foley

Timeline below based on the investigative reporting of Michael Biesecker and Mitch Weiss for the Associated Press.

The principal actors in the timeline below:

Paul J. Foley

  

Kim Strach

Chase Burns

A Key Document in the Investigation

Memo from Kim Strach to Josh Howard in October 2014

State Board of Elections (SBOE) member Paul J. Foley was fishing for information about a confidential SBOE investigation of a man who had paid Foley's law firm at least $1.3 million. In an Oct. 10, 2014, memo to Josh Howard (Chair of the SBOE), Executive Director Kim Strach detailed inappropriate behavior by SBOE member Paul Foley regarding an on-going investigation into large campaign contributions given to Pat McCrory, Paul Tillis, Phil Berger, and other NC politicians in 2012 by Chase Burns, an Oklahoma Internet sweepstakes software magnate who was lobbying NC officials to make internet gambling legal in the state. SBOE Director Strach had learned belatedly that Foley's law firm represented Burns and that Foley's law firm had been paid a large sum by Burns. Foley never disclosed his conflict of interest to Strach or to anyone else at the SBOE. When Strach learned of the conflict, she insisted that Foley recuse himself from the SBOE investigation of Burns, but Foley continued to press for detailed information (particularly about which witnesses were being interviewed). “Mr. Foley stated that he wanted a copy of the findings report sent to him immediately,” Strach recounted in her Oct. 10 memo. Strach said she again advised Foley that would be improper, based on his recusal. “Mr. Foley was not satisfied with my answer …. I was alarmed by Mr. Foley’s behavior today, and I have again cautioned staff not to address any questions from Mr. Foley regarding this ongoing investigation.”

Timeline for Understanding What's Up With Paul Foley

2012 election cycle: Chase Burns, the internet sweepstakes magnate, gives at least $520,000 to dozens of NC politicians including Pat McCrory, who is running for governor. The money is disbursed to those politicians by lobbyists for the Charlotte law firm of Moore & Van Allen, which also happens to be Pat McCrory's former employer. Checks are written on an Oklahoma bank account which is subsequently seized for containing illegal sweepstakes money. The handwriting on the checks draws scrutiny: the politicians' names filled in as payees appear to be in a different handwriting from the amounts on the checks.

March 2013: Chase Burns is arrested in Florida on felony racketeering and conspiracy charges related to a fake veterans’ charity prosecutors say was used to launder $300 million from sweepstakes cafes there. Court filings from the Florida case show that Burns’ company made another $98 million from Internet cafes in North Carolina, though the games were illegal here.

April 19, 2013: Democracy North Carolina files a formal complaint about the Burns contributions with the SBOE, which at that time still has three Democrats and two Republicans sitting on the board. Democracy North Carolina wants to know if the contributions were made using corporate, rather than personal, funds, and was someone other than the contributor directing who received the money?

April 25, 2013: A majority on the SBOE agree that an investigation of Burns is warranted and is therefore set in motion.

April 26, 2013: Newly elected Gov. Pat McCrory replaces every board member on the SBOE to reflect the results of the 2012 elections: three new Republican members and two new Democratic members. Paul Foley is one of the Republicans appointed. The Burns investigation is already underway.

September 2014: SBOE staffers, looking through documents from the Florida investigation, discover that Burns has paid Foley’s law firm nearly $1.3 million between 2009 and March 2013, when Burns was arrested and his accounts frozen (including the account used to send the half-million to the North Carolina politicians).

September 29, 2014: Foley recuses himself from the Burns investigation (but not actually). He continues to press Strach and SBOE investigative staffers for details and updates.

October 10, 2014: Strach spills the beans about Foley's conflict of interest and his behavior to SBOE Chair Josh Howard. Howard quickly requests the Attorney General's office to investigate whether Foley’s conflict of interest tainted the Burns investigation.

June 23, 2015: Senior Deputy Attorney General Alexander Peters concludes in a letter to SBOE Chair Howard that it was proper for Foley to recuse himself from issues involving Burns but that Foley has not compromised the investigation (because SBOE investigators have mainly ignored his fishing). SBOE employees told the Attorney General's office that Foley’s behavior had been “unusual” and “unprecedented.” (SBOE officials hadn’t known about the connection between Foley’s firm and Burns.) The Attorney General's office did not investigate whether Foley had leaked information to lawyers in his firm who were actively representing Burns and said that the ethics commission or the Bar Association would be responsible for addressing whether Foley had acted ethically. Foley meanwhile chooses to interpret this opinion from the Attorney General's office as "exoneration."

BREAKING: NC State Board of Elections Member Paul Foley Exposed for Double-Dealing

Paul Foley

Republican member of the NC State Board of Elections, Paul Foley, is being outed in an Associated Press investigative piece for a pretty massive conflict of interest ... which should come as no surprise for those of us in Watauga County who came to know his secret dealings with "Four" Eggers during the Republican take-over of the Watauga Board of Elections.

Lot of meat here. Digestion will follow.

A Time-Line for Understanding the Suppression of the Vote in Watauga County

Based on documents surrendered in a public records request to the State Board of Elections.

Major Players

Stacy C. Eggers IV ("Four"), attorney for the Republican majority on the Watauga County Commission, attorney for the Watauga County Board of Elections, and major power player in the Watauga GOP.

Paul J. Foley, partner in the Kilpatrick Townsend law firm in Winston-Salem and one of three Republican members of the State Board of Elections, appointed by Governor Pat McCrory on May 1, 2013.

Josh Howard, founding partner of Gammon, Howard, and Zeszotarski in Raleigh and Republican Chair of the State Board of Elections, appointed by Governor Pat McCrory on May 1, 2013.

Kim Strach, Executive Director of the State Board of Elections, who can exercise certain discretionary power independent of the State Board, including the approval of the size and location of certain voting precincts.

TIME-LINE, JUNE - SEPTEMBER 2013

Early June 2013

Stacy C. Eggers IV ("Four"), who was already the minority Republican member of the Watauga County Board of Elections and was still serving on the BOE, angled to be reappointed to the BOE as a member of the new Republican majority. State Board of Elections Chair Josh Howard noticed that Four was also County Attorney, which threw up a red flag of conflict of interest.

June 24, 2013

Republican SBOE member Paul Foley writes to Four: “Are you still county attorney in Watauga? If so, we believe this would create conflicts of interest that could affect the validity of decisions made by the board." [page 70]

June 25, 2013

Four writes Foley, saying “another member of my firm [could] handle the county's matters…. We have made arrangements to address any issues which arise involving the County Board of Elections, and the advice given on any election matters are handled by another attorney who is not connected to my office.” Four gives his cellphone number to Foley and invites him to call.

Within half-an-hour, Foley forwards Four’s email to SBOE Chair Josh Howard. Howard immediately responds: “That's no solution at all” to the problem of a conflict of interest. [page 17]

June 26, 2013

Foley emails Four and copies Howard: “Members of the State Board talked to a number of folks and after such discussions believe that having someone serve as both the County Attorney and on the County BOE is a conflict of interest and, more importantly, could jeopardize the majority that Republicans enjoy on the board in certain circumstances. The Board's required vote on this issue was this morning, before we heard back from you. However, I do not believe that having someone different within a small law firm would change this analysis.” [page 16]

The SBOE appoints Bill Aceto and Jim Hastings as the Republican members for Watauga. Jim Hastings had been listed as second choice to Four.

July 2, 2013

Four indicates he has called Foley and follows up with an email, giving Foley a heads-up that “My county chairwoman [Anne Marie Yates] is ruffled up because she wanted to be consulted in the decision to appoint Jim Hastings to our board.” [page 15]

July 13, 2013

Four receives from Foley a heads-up of upcoming vacancies on other state boards and commissions (a kind of consolation prize? for not being reappointed to the Watauga BOE) [page 13]

July 16, 2013

Bill Aceto and Kathleen Campbell are sworn in as new members of the Watauga BOE. Jim Hastings is not sworn in, telling the Watauga Democrat that he did not want the position and did not know his name had been submitted. ["Only 2 Join Board of Elections," Watauga Democrat, 16  July 2013]

July 23, 2013

Four asks Foley to help him get appointed to the Appalachian State University Board of Trustees, the N.C. Judicial Standards Commission, or the State Judicial Council. [page 13]

That same day, Foley asks the GOP state Party Chair to help get Four appointed to other boards: “Four is from Watauga County and is strongly supported by Virginia Foxx. I think you know the background here. If there is anything you can do on the ones listed below or others, I know Virginia and I would appreciate it.” Foley copies Howard. [page 36]

July 25, 2013

Four writes Foley: “My chairwoman [Anne Marie Yates] asked if I had heard anything regarding a deadline to submit the two [new] substitute names to the State for our County Board of Elections.” [For each single appointment to a BOE, local political parties are required to submit two names.]

August 5, 2013

Two days before his brother Luke is actually appointed to the Watauga BOE (see below), and a week before the Watauga BOE meeting that will take up a long list of new resolutions, Four sends Foley the proposed resolutions: “I anticipate the Watauga BOE will move to pass a couple resolutions shortly, but before they are voted on I wanted to run them by you since they will require the approval of the State Executive Director [Kim Strach] to become effective. Here’s what they [the Republican majority] will want to do: 1) Undo the parting shot of the Democrats board where they passed a One-Stop Plan on their way out the door. 2) Recombine the 3 downtown Boone precincts back into the Boone precinct. The combined precinct would cover only one square mile, and is also the home of the Board of Elections office and early voting. 3) Move two polling sites to get them out of an elementary school and out of the National Guard armory, respectively.” [page 120]

August 7, 2013

Four’s brother Luke Eggers suddenly emerges publicly at the State BOE as the substitute appointee for the Watauga BOE seat originally given to Jim Hastings. [page 74]

Four writes Foley: “I would anticipate some political grousing from the other side, so if you have a moment to review and let me know if you think these would be acceptable I would appreciate it. As you would expect, it would be embarrassing to the local party if the State Director [Kim Strach] flipped one of the local BOE’s decisions.”

August 8, 2013

Four’s brother Luke Eggers sworn in as the third member of the Watauga BOE. Luke immediately calls for a meeting of the Watauga BOE on August 12.

That same day, Four writes Foley: “Thanks for your consideration of my brother yesterday at your meeting. I don’t want to push, but have you had a chance to look over the resolutions for changes the Watauga BOE would like to make? I understand if they are to undo what the last board did about early voting it has to be done before the 19th, and they have to give notice of the meeting to make those changes.”

Foley responds to Four the same day: “Just have the majority submit the plan that they feel is appropriate. Unless something is out of whack with reality, then I don’t think it is likely for the State Board to have any issues with it.”

Four then responds to Foley: “Thanks. I’ll tell them to proceed. I anticipate that some of their actions may encounter resistance from our County Director [Jane Anne Hodges], who may be less than supportive of the new administration.”

Foley immediately responds, “If the county director doesn’t want to follow their lawful instructions, the county director will be removed.”

August 9, 2013

Watauga BOE releases its agenda for the August 12 called meeting, and the Watauga Democrat publishes it the same day, including an interview with Republican GOP Chairwoman Anne Marie Yates, who spills the beans about what is being planned: http://www.wataugademocrat.com/news/article_f9da1baf-5267-5de5-8639-b2a2ed53ffae.html

According to the paper, “Campbell, the minority board member, said she was not consulted or considered in the setting of the meeting time or the agenda. She said she was worried that the two Republican members already seemed to have planned their actions together outside her presence.” Luke Eggers and Aceto could not be reached for comment.

That same day, Foley writes to Four giving him a heads-up that there's a problem with one of the resolutions to be introduced on August 12, the resolution creating a "mega-precinct" out of Boone 1, 2 and 3: “Please give me a call at your convenience. The combining of the University precincts is likely problematic.” [page 117]

August 12, 2013

The notorious first meeting of the Watauga BOE. All hell breaks loose over the implementation of Four Eggers' many new resolutions, including the shutting down of Early Voting on the campus of Appalachian State University, the moving of a town precinct (New River 3) out into the county for the municipal elections, and the imposition of restrictive new rules on Elections Director Jane Anne Hodges. Of particular interest: the resolution to combine Boone 1, 2, and 3 into a "mega-precinct" gets voted on 2-1 despite Foley's earlier warning that the Exec. Dir. in Raleigh had a problem with it.

Bad press travels fast. That same day, Aida Doss Havel (the ex-Wake County BOE Chair) writes Josh Howard and expresses her concerns about newspaper coverage (http://www.hcpress.com/news/httpwww-hcpress-comp75448.html) of the Watauga BOE meeting on the 12^th:

“My concerns are:

1. Lack of "packet" to the Director and the member until just prior to the meeting (and the appearance that the Public Meetings Law was violated).

2. Lack of public comment.

3. Micromanaging of the director.

4. General lack of meeting management.

It will be devastating if this is repeated in 100 counties. I think you and Kim [Strach, Exec. Dir. of the State BOE] need to get out ahead of this fast.” [page 61]

Howard forwards the Havel email to Foley within an hour and says, “plz review.”

In the afternoon after the first meeting of the Watauga BOE, Four reports to Foley: “They had quite a crowd for their meeting this morning, and it was a local version of the Raleigh protests [Moral Mondays]. Fortunately, they didn't have to have anyone arrested, but they did have to read the [contempt] statute to quiet the crowd and have two deputy sheriffs on hand. Chants of 'Shame!' and snide comments from the audience were unfortunately common. We also had a visit from a fellow who stated he was an attorney named Jeremy Collins with the Southern Coalition for Social Justice. Based on my research, I don't think he's passed the bar yet, but apparently hopes to hear favorable news soon. Attached is the chairman's letter [signed by Luke Eggers but written by Four Eggers] regarding the reasoning behind the recombination of the Boone precincts and the resolution which was passed in case they 'get lost' between Boone and Raleigh. It is my understanding that the local Democrats are going to appeal the One-Stop [Early Voting] Plan which replaced their 'last hurrah' effort of the old board. If you need a letter explaining the changes on the One-Stop plan or anything else from Watauga County on this, please let me know at your convenience. I would hate to see this disapproved for insufficient information, because I'm afraid that would only encourage the opposition.”

Foley forwards Four's email to Kim Strach, and he forwards attachments (the other Watauga resolutions) to Howard on the same day. (These attachments were not shared with Republican SBOE member Rhonda Amoroso nor with the two Democratic members.) Foley responds to Four: “Things are going to be interesting moving forward. I have sent the information on to the folks in Raleigh. We’d probably like to have a Republican representative from the Watauga County board present at the meeting where we hear the appeal.” [An appeal of Four's Early Voting plan for Watauga was automatically triggered by the failure of a unanimous vote on August 12.]

August 14, 2013

Four to Foley, summarizing public and press reaction of the August 12 meeting: “They’ve made a great ruckus, but I’m not sure if anyone of them has actually appealed [the Early Voting plan]. If the State sees the One-Stop plan as complying with the requirement that the location is within close proximity to the County election office, as I read the statute there is nothing that necessarily requires review. If the State sees it as not in close proximity, since it was a split vote I think it would require State approval. The opposition was rather smug that if it wasn’t unanimous then the old board decision survives, which isn’t how I read the statute….”

Four asks Foley to let him know if an appeal comes through. Foley: “will do.” [page 179]

August 16, 2013

Democratic member of the SBOE, Joshua Malcolm, has called Howard to talk about the August 12^th meeting and the resolutions passed. Howard responds to Malcolm in an email: “Hey- Aida Doss Havel sent me a link about the Watauga thing and I haven't had a chance to read up on it. Let me do that and get back to you later today.” Howard later responds, “ohh, jeez, what a mess. Blame abounds for this one. I'll call soon....” [page 60]

August 19, 2013

Watauga BOE Republican member Bill Aceto meets with Four and with Nathan Miller (Chairman, Watauga Board of Commissioners) at Four’s office around noon.

August 20, 2013

Four to Foley: “I hope you are doing well. Do you know when the State might have something to help us finalize the changes that were made in our County? It would be nice to close it out and let them move on. Not that it’s really relevant, but I look for the Winston Journal to hack at us in tomorrow’s edition, and according to the other side’s Facebook page Rachel Maddow is coming down to talk to their side. Apparently one of the local activists is friends with one of her deputy producers. The Congressperson [Virginia Foxx] always said the WSJ was a shill for the opposition. Good times here. Hope you can help shut down this foolishness. Thanks for your help!” [page 102]

A few minutes later, Foley responds, “Can you do a temporary transfer of the precincts instead?”

August 23, 2013

Foley has called Four on the phone, but Four has missed his call. Four says he would consider the prospect of a temporary transfer of the precincts. Invited Foley to call him on his cell.

Foley responds immediately that he is on a plane and asks Four to call him the next day. [page 100]

August 26, 2013

Foley emails Four to question some Watauga turnout numbers. Four responds and adds, “Also, I’ve asked my brother to blind copy you on an email with the Google earth maps showing both sides of the building [Agricultural Conference Ctr, which Four wants to designate as the new polling place for the combined Boone 1, 2 & 3 mega-precinct] which is proposed to be used. I can’t imagine the State staff will appreciate the lack of candor about that issue from the other side. As an aside, the County is going to upgrade its walkway around the building to make sure it’s as accessible as possible." [page 100]

A work order was put in the next day by the Watauga County Manager for improvements “to accommodate voting traffic” at the Agricultural Conference Center. The County Manager has declined to say who ordered the work, but County Commission Chair Nathan Miller said he did in the Watauga Democrat of September 17, 2014 ("Eggers' emailsto SBOE draw scrutiny").

August 27, 2013

Minority member of the Watauga BOE, Kathleen Campbell, to Four Eggers: “I am the Democratic member of the Board of Elections and I have a question I would like for you, as county attorney, to answer regarding the minutes of our meetings. Can you give me a written opinion as to whether or not it is permissible for a single member to modify the minutes by changing the report of what action was taken?"

August 28, 2013

Four responds to Campbell, saying he can’t help her with legal advice: “Typically, the county attorney provides legal advice as requested by the Board of Commissioners, the county manager, or the various boards of the county as a whole as needed. This policy was adopted by the county in an effort to control legal expenses, and avoid expenses not otherwise authorized by the county."

That same day, in an exchange of emails on issues arising in other counties, Howard also asks Foley, “Where are you on Watauga stuff?” [page 56]

August 29, 2013

Howard writes to Foley to tell him that SBOE Exec. Dir. Kim Strach wants to release her negative decision on combining Boone 1, 2 & 3 precincts before the hearing on the Early Voting plan appeal, because she hears busloads of ASU students are coming to Raleigh. Foley to Howard: “I talked with Kim and I generally agree with her denying the permanent consolidation of the precincts. The difficult part here is that I forwarded her that proposal on August 6 and didn't hear back until after the Watauga meeting on August 12th that there might be a problem and, even then, it was just a general 'that's an awfully large precinct.' Because I hadn't heard anything from the State, I told the folks in Watauga that I hadn't heard anything back from the State, but that I believed the State Board would generally do what we could to support them.” [page 53]

September 3, 2013

SBOE Hearing in Raleigh on Kathleen Campbell's submitted minority Early Voting plan for Watauga. The SBOE votes to approve the Four Eggers Early Voting plan.

September 4, 2013

Because SBOE Exec. Dir. Kim Strach rejected the combination of Boone 1, 2 & 3 precincts into a mega-precinct, the Watauga BOE met the day after the hearing in Raleigh to withdraw that resolution. Eggers and Aceto vote instead to designate Legends as the polling site for Boone 2 precinct, rather than the Linville Falls Room in the Student Union, where the precinct polling place has been for several election cycles (Watauga Democrat, "UPDATE: Legends Chosen as Polling Site," Sept. 3 2013].

A series of emails fly following that meeting:

In a response to a forwarded email from Howard, Democratic SBOE member Joshua Malcolm writes: “I believe our friends in Watauga [Eggers and Aceto] let pride get in their way tonight with the move to Legends instead of the Linville Falls Room on the ASU campus. I don't know whether these young fellas understand there is a time to yield on things when others have better ideas.”

Howard responds to Malcolm, “good lord, this is the first I've heard-- what did they do?"

Malcolm to Howard: “They moved the ASU voting precinct location to Legends, which the Univ. stated in writing was flood prone, nonventilated etc. etc. etc. The Director [Jane Anne Hodges] recommended the Linville location as well. It was the location shown by the photos yesterday by board member Campbell as a potential one stop location. I don't understand....”

Howard responds: “me either. we'll work it out. I need to focus on my law practice for a couple of days-- let's table this until next week.”

Howard forwards Malcolm’s email to Foley: “Holy cow, what did they do? Isn't legends a bar or something?”

Foley responds to Howard: “Yeah, I think Legends is a bar on campus. The only one in the UNC system-- I think. I have never been to Boone, so I can't speak with any authority on which site might be better.” [pages 30/43]

That same day, Four writes to Foley to report on the Sept. 4 Watauga BOE meeting and to complain about it: “They had another fun crowd show up in Boone, and we’ve got another Youtube video courtesy of Ms. Campbell’s supporters…. I particularly like the scenes of Ms. Campbell arguing to her audience, showing them her pictures instead of the board, and asking the audience for a show of hands as to who supported which site….  On an aside note, the Democratic party mobilized its people against our new choice [Legends]. The director of the student union and Legends, an unsuccessful Democratic candidate for county commissioner, had told me when I was on the board of elections that Legends was a “way better” site than the student union and asked Jane Hodges and I to please work on moving there…. I’m particularly disappointed in our Director, who for the entire time I was on the Board complained about all the problems at the Student Union and begged us to move to Legends. [Director Hodges says she did advocate for a temporary move to Legends some years back when the Student Union was being renovated.] …. Now, with the mob in attendance being asked for a straw poll, [Jane Anne Hodges] says the Student Union would be easier on her staff…. I’m sorry to vent to you, because you have enough on your plate, but I figured you would understand the aggravation of this situation. Hopefully, with this being the last intended move by the board, things will settle down and life can go on. I would also hope Ms. Strach would support their decision. Sorry again for the hassle, and I hope you have a good evening. Perhaps I can quit hassling you soon.” [page 194]

September 12, 2013

Bertrand Gutierrez, reporter for the Winston-Salem Journal, investigating the "digital thumbprint" on documents submitted by the Watauga BOE to the SBOE -- a "digital thumbprint" that subsequently proves that Four Eggers is the actual author of all resolutions and letters -- puts in a call for comment to SBOE Chair Howard. Howard emails Foley --Subject “ws Journal calling about four eggers”: “Largely punting and referring to you.” [page 72]

Howard to Foley, Subject “they've used metadata to ID four eggers as the author of the Legends plan.” “And the precinct thing. [The article will run] Sunday.” [page 72]

September 15, 2013

The Bertrand Gutierrez article, "One County Attorney, Two Hats: Documents Show Attorney as Author Behind Key Resolutions," appears in the Winston-Salem Journal on the front page. The article contains this passage quoting SBOE Chair Josh Howard:

"All this comes after the N.C. State Board of Elections did not consider appointing Four Eggers in June to the county elections board even though the state Republican Party had submitted his name as its No. 1 choice. The state board members considered only the state Republican Party’s secondary picks, according to various documents related to the appointment, obtained through public-record requests by the Winston-Salem Journal. 'He serves as the county attorney,' said Josh Howard, a Republican, the chairman of the N.C. State Board of Elections. 'I don’t think he can do both jobs because the county attorney often has to advise the county board of elections.' ” 

In the same article, County Commission Chair Nathan Miller is quoted: “If he [Four Eggers] wants to give advice to his brother, free and off the public doles, so that he's not taking any public money, then so be it. I'm not going to stop him from giving advice to his brother. And I don't think that creates any kind of conflict."