 |
| Rep. David Lewis |
Civil war breaks out among
Republican members of the General Assembly, and it ain't patty-cake. The most
conservative members are accusing establishment leaders of being no better than
jail-bird Democrat Jim Black.
Current target of
backbiting and bitterness: NC House Rules Chair David Lewis of Dunn, strongly
suspected of "pay-to-play" favoritism and of putting his thumb on
legislative scales. (Lewis had previously been implicated in another cronyism
scandal, so the charges are mounting up against The Man Who Would Be Speaker.)
Chief accuser of Lewis:
Rep. Justin Burr of Albemarle, whose bill to save money on mandated printing ofcourt decisions, got modified by Lewis at the last minute (according to Burr)
to protect the financial interests of one of Lewis's donors.
The printing contract held by New Bern
businessman Owen Andrews is worth, on average, about $350,000 annually, and
Rep. Burr's bill would have shut down that money spigot. But businessman
Andrews is and has been a dependable donor to Lewis.
March 4, 2015: A House judiciary committee signed off on Burr's bill and
sent it to a budget committee for further review.
June 9: Burr's bill gets removed from the budget committee and referred
to the Rules Committee, which Lewis chairs.
July 22: With Burr out of state, Rules met to consider changes to the
bill, with Lewis leading the meeting. Lewis changes the bill to keep the money
flowing to his donor businessman Andrews.
Burr's bill next went to the Finance Committee. There, Rep. Mike Hager,
a Rutherfordton Republican, House majority leader, and conservative rival to
Lewis, returned the bill to its original form, eliminating the mandate for the
printing of the court reports. That version passed through that committee and
was approved unanimously by the full House, including
Lewis, in mid-August. But Burr's bill never passed the Senate.
Ethics Complaint Filed
Against Lewis
Jump to December 2015: Rep. George Cleveland, a Jacksonville Republican,
filed a complaint against Lewis with the General Assembly's Legislative Ethics
Committee, dealing with the previous pay-to-play accusations investigation bythe News&Observer -- that Lewis protected the state contract of a company
run by Lewis' friend and campaign donor, Rickie Day.
Both
donors now implicated as favored cronies of Lewis -- Owen Andrews and Rickie
Day -- inexplicably got their names, occupations, and/or businesses
mis-reported or misspelled in Lewis's campaign finance reports filed with the
state Board of Elections, making investigation of pay-to-play activities more
difficult. If done deliberately, the misspellings were a juvenile and
transparent cover-up.
Reps. Burr and Hager joined Rep. Cleveland to form a potent
whistle-blowing trio against Lewis. Burr and Hager suggested that discrepancies
in Lewis's finance reports "were done intentionally to try to mislead the
public about who was giving to his campaign." Rep. Burr said, "Once is
an error. Twice is a pattern."
Indeed.
"Lewis and Hager, as
Rules chairman and majority leader, respectively, are two of the most powerful
House members. The fact that they are feuding so openly points to serious
divisions among House Republicans. In speaking out against Lewis, Hager cited a
need to 'defend the integrity of the caucus'."
The feud has broken out into the public and not only in the pages of
the state's daily newspapers. Tea Party blogger Brant Clifton has his longknives out for Lewis (and for also-tainted-with-financial-irregularity-allegations Tim Moore, who is the current Republican Speaker of the House).
No comments:
Post a Comment