tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6194583.post2349493691590425510..comments2024-03-22T13:06:27.366-05:00Comments on WataugaWatch: A Credit to His SpeciesJ.W. Williamsonhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/17694324792688711136noreply@blogger.comBlogger37125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6194583.post-6445445584551597482010-07-20T09:37:00.269-05:002010-07-20T09:37:00.269-05:00Yes relax because you have been beat yet another t...Yes relax because you have been beat yet another time. You would keep going but you have nothing to say. Not one person was able to refute or even argue my irrepresible points. How does it feel to be so totally beaten? Mike D (ummy), if your only alli here is a cheerleader who can barely write, then you might want to reflect a bit on where it is you went wrong. <br /><br /><br />Your ole pal<br /><br />Johnny Rico<br /><br />PS I wonJohnny Riconoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6194583.post-55239226023136647602010-07-19T17:34:54.600-05:002010-07-19T17:34:54.600-05:00Mike D(amn Good!)
Good last post. But relax, all ...Mike D(amn Good!)<br /><br />Good last post. But relax, all of the WW community knows what an immature jerk Wacko Rico is. We just try to ignore this parasite.BikerBardnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6194583.post-35478914941270202682010-07-18T22:26:27.566-05:002010-07-18T22:26:27.566-05:00"That last "Anonymous" post WAS Ric..."That last "Anonymous" post WAS Rico. See, we know your games."<br /><br />Wrong. It is sad that you are so delusional that you think more than one person cannot disagree with you. In any event, all I said was that no one has been able to even attempt to refute Rico's points. They just attack her.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6194583.post-49044563238981386802010-07-18T21:08:36.573-05:002010-07-18T21:08:36.573-05:00No, I don't need to go Anonymous with my posts...No, I don't need to go Anonymous with my posts. I want any bashings I give to the liberals to be credited to me fair and square. The Anonymous poster is pretty darn good though.<br /><br />Your ole pal<br /><br />Johnny Rico<br /><br />PS Got a bug problem?Johnny Riconoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6194583.post-7289640582888081302010-07-18T20:53:30.553-05:002010-07-18T20:53:30.553-05:00To all:
That last "Anonymous" post WAS ...To all:<br /><br />That last "Anonymous" post WAS Rico. See, we know your games.WeCanBaMouse2noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6194583.post-24636401698932102702010-07-18T13:30:56.897-05:002010-07-18T13:30:56.897-05:00MikeD, I would like to see your arguments that ref...MikeD, I would like to see your arguments that refute what Rico has put forth as to the No Guns For Negroes video and Clarence Thomas are concerned. You have only called her names and avoided the issue. Usually you do much better than this. So far you have been disappointing on this thread. What are your arguments and where are your proofs? Maybe you are to busy admiring the Bard's heroic muscles to make your usual competent arguments. <br /><br />As far as I can tell the only attacks Rico has made appear to be intended to solicit a logical response from you. She has failed.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6194583.post-84161967560502143112010-07-18T11:27:49.183-05:002010-07-18T11:27:49.183-05:00Mike D(ummy),
And who might this "capable ad...Mike D(ummy),<br /><br />And who might this "capable adversary" you talk about? I haven't met this person on this site yet, and never will as liberal socialist sheep such as yourself will never be able to hold an arguement with me as your moral and ethical foundation are faulty. Besides, if you are trying to gain sympathy from the post idiot, Tricyle Lard, then you certainly have a ways to go before you could hold your own with me. LOL!!<br /><br />At any rate, as the anonymous poster said, can you refute anything I have said in regards to the "No Guns for Negros"/Clarence Thomas analogy that I pointed out? That's what I thought Mike D (umm), you cannot. You know it, I know it, and the others on this site know it. Give it up, pay another five bucks, and try your luck again. <br /><br />Oh yeah, one more thing - LOL!!!!!!!!<br /><br />Your ole pal<br /><br />Johnny Rico<br /><br />PS I won<br /><br />BetsyJohnny Riconoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6194583.post-86478331725263158372010-07-18T02:03:39.099-05:002010-07-18T02:03:39.099-05:00Not to worry, BikerBard,
Rico accidentally, in a...Not to worry, BikerBard, <br /><br />Rico accidentally, in an an inadvertent moment of truth, revealed himself to me as dishonest. You may disagree with my views, perhaps even sometimes dislike me because of our differences, but you always know that I am representing what I believe is the truth.<br /><br />Rico places no value on truth, only goals and ideology. He tries to emulate Ann Coulter, and fails miserably. In case you don't know Ann Coulter, she carries the philosophy that the best defense is an onslaught style offense. Defend <b>your</b> views, and she <b>attacks more</b>. Attack <b>her</b> views, and she <b>attacks more</b>. This is the program that the pathetic liar Johnny Rico attempts to replicate.<br /><br />Rico is simple minded and transparent, and his faulty, super fast processor doesn't even recognize his obvious mental frailties. If his statements were benign, I would not even consider diagnosing his deficiency, but he is anything but benign. He wants to hurt other human beings, so he now has a capable adversary.<br /><br />Johnny Rico does not deserve anger, only pity. <br /><br />He is a pathetic loser who tries to hurt people.Mike D.noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6194583.post-12147974755249739492010-07-17T22:22:23.240-05:002010-07-17T22:22:23.240-05:00Don't bite, folks.
Stand tough, Mike! Notice...Don't bite, folks. <br /><br />Stand tough, Mike! Notice how this loser BOY spends a lot of time trying to say he is a "strong female." LOL!<br /><br />DNFTTBikerBardnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6194583.post-769078661664249002010-07-17T16:27:24.595-05:002010-07-17T16:27:24.595-05:00"You just cannot argue with some people. John..."You just cannot argue with some people. Johnny Rico is one of them. Facts just don't matter with this one."<br /><br />So far no one has presented any facts to refute Rico's points. When they do, they can gain credibility. Calling her names and using personal attacks only hurts the image of those that disagree with her points.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6194583.post-91033561272782202532010-07-17T10:29:54.436-05:002010-07-17T10:29:54.436-05:00You just cannot argue with some people. Johnny Ric...You just cannot argue with some people. Johnny Rico is one of them. Facts just don't matter with this one.facts don't matternoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6194583.post-27326776221078984302010-07-16T19:42:38.975-05:002010-07-16T19:42:38.975-05:00Mike D(ummy),
With the terrible language and insi...Mike D(ummy),<br /><br />With the terrible language and insinuations you use, I propose you should be banned. I never use poor, disrespectful language in my posts, only logic and reasoning. It is funny though that you are curious about my friends. Is this because you have a bit of trouble balancing your beliefs with your friends? I'll give you some advice - potential friends will be drawn to you as a person, not what you want them to think you are. Not to say I haven't driven a boyfriend or two away because I pack a pistol everywhere I go or because they are unable to cope with a strong female. Too bad for them, and too bad for you! LOL!!! <br /><br />I can only guess it must be this reasoning and logic that offends and scares you so much. The other liberal socialists are afraid to post against my essential truths, that much is very evident. You on the other hand, let your fear get the best of you by lashing out in the same loathing manner that the KKK lashed out against former slaves or Pelosi lashed out against the Tea Party. I do not live in fear, just a world of freedom and personal responsibility. You should try that sometime instead of hiding behind a mass of hate speech.<br /><br />Do you have any reply to my posts? Again, do you have ANY evidence that what I say is not true? I didn't think so! We deal on facts, not emotions Mr. D. LOL!!!! <br /><br />Your ole pal<br /><br />Johnny Rico<br /><br />SarahJohnny Riconoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6194583.post-34184804219487191982010-07-16T19:35:20.721-05:002010-07-16T19:35:20.721-05:00It looks like Rico has silenced another detractor ...It looks like Rico has silenced another detractor that cannot come up with arguments to refute her points. <br /><br />You do not have to like her. Just make a logical argument against what she says. So far you have not. <br /><br />By By MikeD.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6194583.post-67882505478080758152010-07-16T08:37:27.381-05:002010-07-16T08:37:27.381-05:00Rico seems to be pretty good at registering anonym...Rico seems to be pretty good at registering anonymous accounts to defend herself. Could this be one of them? Only the Shadow knows for sure.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6194583.post-5461194042143367442010-07-15T21:26:11.092-05:002010-07-15T21:26:11.092-05:00Rico,
Remember when you claimed that you are bann...Rico,<br /><br />Remember when you claimed that you are banned from WataugaWatch? Kinda look like an idiot now, eh, considering you are currently posting here?<br /><br />Remember, deep within your complaining on the other site about the ban, when you admitted that you were specifically trying to get banned by making such a pest of yourself that the webmaster would have no choice but to ban you, thus providing you with the excuse you needed to claim 'victim of censorship' status? Dude, you admitted to it, and you are a pathetic, weakling coward.<br /><br />So here you are again, doing exactly the same thing.<br /><br />You think only liberals have a problem with your social deviance? You might want to ask the WataugaWatch community whether Mike D. is a liberal before you go plowing your way blindly through the reality.<br /><br />You are an idiot, and you are an asshole, and I don't even use terms like that for Craig Dudley.<br /><br />You want to get banned again, as you admittedly tried to get the first time it happened? I say "Go for it, J.W., ban the bitch-ass coward."<br /><br />Johnny Rico, you are a worthless loser, and when you die, you will die alone and friendless, mourned only by the parasites which inhabit your bedsores.<br /><br />As of this moment, say what you wish for as long as you are allowed. I now join BikerBard, not because I agree with his politics, but because I agree with his assessment of your value as a human being. I will no longer acknowledge your posts.<br /><br />Get a life, you pathetic loser.Mike D.noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6194583.post-86497911894244513452010-07-15T20:55:28.676-05:002010-07-15T20:55:28.676-05:00It looks like I have won again. When a liberal is...It looks like I have won again. When a liberal is unable to generate even a modicum of resistance they rationalize it by drawing attention to some non-existant condition afflicting the adversary. I was waiting on you idiots to get all emotional as you normally do. What I find especially noteworthy is the fact Shylock hid from the essential truth that I pointed out. Then we have Tricycle Lard (Cheerleader) who finally got some tripe printed after his mommy made the obligatory Spahetti Os. LOL!! Does ANYONE have anything to come with? Something please. Winning is so easy on this site that it is not very much fun. LOL!!!! Your ole pal<br /><br />Johnny Rico<br /><br />PS I won!!!<br /><br />BetsyJohnny Riconoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6194583.post-39474900317138228142010-07-15T18:23:31.651-05:002010-07-15T18:23:31.651-05:00Rico is a troll, so I will no longer feed IT. Agre...Rico is a troll, so I will no longer feed IT. Agreed.Rico is ...noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6194583.post-60583906683727294852010-07-15T17:57:45.793-05:002010-07-15T17:57:45.793-05:00DNFTTDNFTTBikerBardnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6194583.post-68816364766337390252010-07-15T17:38:00.977-05:002010-07-15T17:38:00.977-05:00Once again the Bard makes a personal attack with n...Once again the Bard makes a personal attack with no rebuttal to any of Rico's points. This doesn't make the Bard very effective. If the Bard disagrees with Rico, he should make some statements that prove his point of view and give something to back them up. Rico does this so surely the Bard can do the same thing.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6194583.post-55260632415529712822010-07-15T17:25:49.745-05:002010-07-15T17:25:49.745-05:00I think you are all giving Rico just what he crave...I think you are all giving Rico just what he craves - ATTENTION. He is an immature, thoughtless, inciteful (not "insightful")asshole. He has posted just now on this thread as "Johnny Rico" (he & she) "JR", "Johnny Rico is" and "In Awe of Lib POV." That is all Rico. <br /><br />Please stop feeding the troll under our bridge (DNFTT!) DO NOT RESPOND TO /HIM/HER/IT!BikerBardnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6194583.post-35770299494495626762010-07-15T17:18:16.468-05:002010-07-15T17:18:16.468-05:00Actually, Rico usually is more logical and present...Actually, Rico usually is more logical and presents more documentation to back up her arguments than does MikeD.<br /><br />It is interesting that MIkeD feels comfortable making assumptions about Rico's gender. Should we then make assumptions about MikeD's sexuality due to his description of BikerBard being a being a larger ,stronger and more handsome version of a male movie star, Joe Pisce (sp)? I think not because we would be making the same mistake MikeD has made.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6194583.post-80531404094509734752010-07-15T14:28:03.799-05:002010-07-15T14:28:03.799-05:00Back to gay marriage
It is illegal in North Carol...Back to gay marriage<br /><br />It is illegal in North Carolina and personally believe it should stay that way. <br /><br />I noticed a post in the past week or so regarding a gay union taking place at a local church in Watauga County. I understand that it was performed at a High Country UCC, whatever that is. Their minister (a female minister) performed the union. This information came from a Baptist who advised me the minister performing the union was an ordained Baptist minister. I did not think Baptist ordained women ???, so that information may be wrong. This person also informed me that it was two lesbians and one of them held a position in this county that should be a role model to others.<br /><br />Shame on the minister performing this union!!!<br /><br />To the new couple: You are not marriedAnonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6194583.post-31706367421291740852010-07-15T09:34:19.369-05:002010-07-15T09:34:19.369-05:00Anonymous,
Quite correct! My post was not racist...Anonymous,<br /><br />Quite correct! My post was not racist, but sexist, just like that book "Women are from Venus, Men are from Mars".<br /><br />And I stand by my guess. There is no way Rico is female.<br /><br />Rico is an hyperactive male whose typing fingers move more quickly than his mind's ability to analytically process information.<br /><br />His mind does move quickly, but he mistakes a quick mind for a thorough mind. He feels that the speed of his processor makes it a good processor, but he does not understand that being the first in the class to finish an exam doesn't mean anything if you only get 50% of the answers right.<br /><br />His fast mind and fast fingers gloss over important details as he races to conclusions.Mike D.noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6194583.post-60130459568718478272010-07-15T06:19:36.941-05:002010-07-15T06:19:36.941-05:00Rico, you made a mistake. You accused MikeD of be...Rico, you made a mistake. You accused MikeD of being racist. He was not racist. He was sexist. You chose the wrong bigotry.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6194583.post-61071669250303105552010-07-14T17:38:38.795-05:002010-07-14T17:38:38.795-05:00Mike D (ummy)
Your submission is the usual libera...Mike D (ummy)<br /><br />Your submission is the usual liberal socialist submission (submission is an excellant word for liberals) that dodges tough truths. This post is a clear example of folks running away from something they hate being called on. <br /><br />As for my gender, it seems as if you have a problem with strong females. Most liberals do. Ann Coulter gives you guys fits and you hate her for it. To disparage someone over their gender is the same thing my posts point out with the "No Guns for Negros" video and Clarence Thomas' supporting opinion. Quit being racist. <br /><br />At any rate, I see I will have no opposition whatsoever which is what I have came to expect. LOL!!<br /><br />Your ole pal<br /><br />Johnny Rico<br /><br />LisaJohnny "Stinger" Riconoreply@blogger.com