tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6194583.post204165012660953209..comments2024-03-22T13:06:27.366-05:00Comments on WataugaWatch: LogicJ.W. Williamsonhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/17694324792688711136noreply@blogger.comBlogger38125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6194583.post-60973720876362333842010-05-23T22:04:30.625-05:002010-05-23T22:04:30.625-05:00Spent some time on excavation sites myself. Some o...Spent some time on excavation sites myself. Some operators are skilled technicians! Wonderful to watch!BikerBardnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6194583.post-55809561196034997412010-05-23T19:59:48.585-05:002010-05-23T19:59:48.585-05:00BikerBard, why to you fear Guy Fuax so much?BikerBard, why to you fear Guy Fuax so much?Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6194583.post-37948750446725203672010-05-22T17:11:21.018-05:002010-05-22T17:11:21.018-05:00I am not Faux. He has a far different picture of ...I am not Faux. He has a far different picture of things than me. I simply thought that many folks would understand what a D9 was as I did by my childhood fascination with Bulldozers. I really love to watch bulldozers. I remember one particular instance back in 74 when I would go to the Roses Parking Lot (Southgate Shopping Center) and watch an extremely brave (or stupid) bulldozer operator carving a road out on a sheer cliff on the hillside behind Roses. Anyone remember that? I think that cliff is mostly overgrown or maybe the new student condos are there now. Exciting to watch.<br /> Apology accepted. <br /><br />I believe I will switch to Dog Tom Coffey for a while and retire D9 for the time being.D9noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6194583.post-11945918285867379202010-05-21T18:39:17.186-05:002010-05-21T18:39:17.186-05:00D9 AKA "Dog Tom"
I guess I owe you an a...D9 AKA "Dog Tom"<br /><br />I guess I owe you an apology. If you say you are not the lying weasel Guy Faux, then so be it. Faux likes to hide under assumed names. Sorry.BikerBardnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6194583.post-67033010449155188912010-05-21T18:35:49.503-05:002010-05-21T18:35:49.503-05:00Moby Dick:
The obsession is with YOU looking for s...Moby Dick:<br />The obsession is with YOU looking for sexual meaning when there is none. Is sex all you think about?<br /><br />Thanks for the Bible lesson. Now here's one for you:<br /><br />"Physician, heal yourself." <br /> - Luke 4:23BikerBardnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6194583.post-37175468884691439112010-05-21T07:08:54.474-05:002010-05-21T07:08:54.474-05:00No one insulted you BikerBard. I just pointed out...No one insulted you BikerBard. I just pointed out your obsession. You then proved the observation right by making the "moby dick" comment.<br /><br />Thank's for the District 9 explanation.<br /><br />Ishmael is a Biblical name not just a Melville character. He was Abraham's eldest son. Some consider him to be the father of the Arabs. He is also supposed to be representative of the Old Testament Jews.Ishmaelnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6194583.post-70556102910029141982010-05-21T03:53:58.997-05:002010-05-21T03:53:58.997-05:00Mr. Bard,
D9 has nothing to do with a Sci Fi movi...Mr. Bard,<br /><br />D9 has nothing to do with a Sci Fi movie. It is indeed a bulldozer. I have always been a fan of big bulldozers! I am Dog Tom Coffey and have posted under that name in the past. Do you know the significance of this name? If you are a true local, then you should have heard of this name.<br /><br />Dog Tom (Aka D9)Dog Tom Coffeynoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6194583.post-86693741951119832642010-05-20T19:25:09.717-05:002010-05-20T19:25:09.717-05:00I'll be happy to call you Ishmael. But if you ...I'll be happy to call you Ishmael. But if you insult me, I'll just call you a "moby dick!" <br /><br />District 9 is a sci-fi film, recently released on video. Try Blockbuster - it's a fine film!<br /><br />Now:<br />"How now, what art thou?" -W.S.BikerBardnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6194583.post-37009665679472846182010-05-20T12:26:27.532-05:002010-05-20T12:26:27.532-05:00"Why do you want to make assumptions about so..."Why do you want to make assumptions about some man"s "you know"?"<br /><br />Those kind of things seam to stay on BikerBard's mind. Notice the cross-dressing statement about D9. <br /><br />Isn't D9 a bulldozer? I have never heard of District 9. What is that?Ishmaelnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6194583.post-15379415586529108122010-05-20T07:46:25.899-05:002010-05-20T07:46:25.899-05:00Pitiful rebuttal, BikerBard. Why do you want to m...Pitiful rebuttal, BikerBard. Why do you want to make assumptions about some man"s "you know"? How is that relevant to the thread? Wouldn't it be better if you answered the questions?Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6194583.post-52233359579810324462010-05-19T18:10:57.473-05:002010-05-19T18:10:57.473-05:00And here I thought a Brown Bess was a slave girl b...And here I thought a Brown Bess was a slave girl bringing water to the musketeers. And a Kentucky Long Rifle, well, I assumed it was Daniel Boone's, er, well, you know.BikerBardnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6194583.post-14909111410187506022010-05-19T09:59:50.092-05:002010-05-19T09:59:50.092-05:00BikerBard, what was the effective range of the Bro...BikerBard, what was the effective range of the Brown Bess musket used by the British troops? What was the effective range of a Kentucky (Pennsylvania) long rifle owned by an individual that was used against them. Which was the "assault rifle" of its day? <br /><br />Your enormous ignorance is showing again.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6194583.post-46429826022519391602010-05-18T21:45:44.934-05:002010-05-18T21:45:44.934-05:00Sure, Bridle: Don't you remember the Glock Fli...Sure, Bridle: Don't you remember the Glock Flintlock and the AK-1 the Minutemen used? Changed the war with weapons of mass instruction!BikerBardnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6194583.post-2309266999072445862010-05-18T20:19:56.476-05:002010-05-18T20:19:56.476-05:00ya can't argue with gun nuts...after all the N...ya can't argue with gun nuts...after all the NRA convention was filled with Palin Stiffies!!sloopdoghttps://www.blogger.com/profile/12266564252722897264noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6194583.post-57545616759827224802010-05-18T19:08:17.697-05:002010-05-18T19:08:17.697-05:00So Bridle drags out the old gun vs. driving argume...So Bridle drags out the old gun vs. driving argument. Right vs. privilege aside, the argument doesn't hold water, because you don't need a license to buy or own a car, and you don't need a license to drive a car on private land. So why would someone need a license to buy or own a gun?Watauga County Anarchistnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6194583.post-54910800621601279342010-05-18T13:29:02.187-05:002010-05-18T13:29:02.187-05:00The founding fathers had no idea that weapons such...The founding fathers had no idea that weapons such as the AK47 would ever exist. No one needs an assault weapon for hunting or even protection, unless they are drug dealers* bridle<br /><br />Sure they did! They were into Weapons of Mass Chaos against the Redcoats! No doubt your fuzzy knowledge of revolutionary history is a little short on weapons own by individuals against the King! I am sure a Kentucy long rifle would have got your attention at the battle Kings Mountain right between the eyeballs!Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6194583.post-72481552036244931592010-05-18T11:20:20.339-05:002010-05-18T11:20:20.339-05:00Watauga County Anarchist, good luck in explaining ...Watauga County Anarchist, good luck in explaining the difference in a semi-automatic AK47 that functions the same as a hunting rifle and a fully automatic or select fire assault rifle to someone that does not know the difference between a right and a privilege. Also good luck if you ever mention that it is not illegal to own a fully automatic assault rifle.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6194583.post-70586558923841793862010-05-18T07:15:39.002-05:002010-05-18T07:15:39.002-05:00BikerBard, you do not have the ability to refute a...BikerBard, you do not have the ability to refute anyone. <br /><br />Keep dreaming that other people use your tactics.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6194583.post-63919012837701705882010-05-17T22:01:01.516-05:002010-05-17T22:01:01.516-05:00Ignorant Bridle says, "The founding fathers h...Ignorant Bridle says, "The founding fathers had no idea that weapons such as the AK47 would ever exist. No one needs an assault weapon for hunting or even protection, unless they are drug dealers."<br /><br />I own an AK-47, but I don't own an assault rifle. My AK is a legal, semi-auto, less powerful than my grandpa's semi-auto BAR. But because it is uglier than my grandpa's BAR, gun grabbers like Bridle want to ban it. BTW, all of my AK ammo is full-metal jacket, less damaging than Grandpa's hollow points, but the gun grabbers want to ban my AK ammo simply because it is military ammo.Watauga County Anarchistnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6194583.post-36249403247950762772010-05-17T19:42:32.589-05:002010-05-17T19:42:32.589-05:00Bridle: Nicely done on both of your last posts! Yo...Bridle: Nicely done on both of your last posts! You have the patience to refute this moron - I do not. Also, these clowns like to post under one name, then congratulate themselves under another name. D9 and Anonymous = one blogger?? Hmmmmmm???BikerBardnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6194583.post-37874260151357922132010-05-17T17:05:41.710-05:002010-05-17T17:05:41.710-05:00The phrase a well regulated militia meant having t...The phrase a well regulated militia meant having the ability to resist a standing army.<br /><br />The founding fathers also had no idea there would be computers and the internet or radio or television. This does not negate the first amendment. In their papers they wrote that the people should always be armed as well as the standing army. The Supreme Court Case the U.S. vs. Miller agreed with this.<br /><br />As decided in the Heller decision, one has the right to own a gun. Owning and driving a car is a privilege, not a right.<br /><br />Your arguments do not stand up to scrutiny.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6194583.post-58690427403947858742010-05-17T16:40:05.931-05:002010-05-17T16:40:05.931-05:00Anonymous, Lott's work is quite controversial...Anonymous, Lott's work is quite controversial and has been disputed by many other researchers. This <a href="http://works.bepress.com/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1008&context=john_donohue" rel="nofollow"> review</a> for example concludes (Page 104) that Lott's hypothesis has "not withstood the test of time and that no longer can any plausible case be made on statistical grounds that shall issue laws reduce crime".<br /><br />I wonder why people who advocate for the second amendment always seem to forget about the first half of the sentence. The part that states "well-regulated". <br />What's wrong with keeping balance and common sense in the picture? Sure, we shouldn't outlaw all weapons, but let's regulate them at least as much as we regulate cars!<br />The founding fathers had no idea that weapons such as the AK47 would ever exist. No one needs an assault weapon for hunting or even protection, unless they are drug dealers.bridlenoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6194583.post-23345787280838886832010-05-17T16:14:30.575-05:002010-05-17T16:14:30.575-05:00Anonymous, Lott's work is quite controversial...Anonymous, Lott's work is quite controversial and has been disputed by many other researchers. This <a href="http://works.bepress.com/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1008&context=john_donohue" rel="nofollow"> review</a> for example concludes (Page 104) that Lott's hypothesis has "not withstood the test of time and that no longer can any plausible case be made on statistical grounds that shall issue laws reduce crime".<br /><br />I wonder why people who advocate for the second amendment always seem to forget about the first half of the sentence. The part that states "well-regulated". <br />What's wrong with keeping balance and common sense in the picture? Sure, we shouldn't outlaw all weapons, but let's regulate them at least as much as we regulate cars!<br />The founding fathers had no idea that weapons such as the AK47 would ever exist. No one needs an assault weapon for hunting or even protection, unless they are drug dealers.bridlenoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6194583.post-29243598256190931512010-05-17T10:46:02.697-05:002010-05-17T10:46:02.697-05:00Te Charlotte Observer said there were 80,000 peop...Te Charlotte Observer said there were 80,000 people at the N.R.A. convention and 20 protesters. Sounds about right.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6194583.post-39313927697039305592010-05-17T10:19:23.866-05:002010-05-17T10:19:23.866-05:00Unlike the rest of you, D9 posted statements that ...Unlike the rest of you, D9 posted statements that were based in facts and supported by examples that could be proven. <br /><br />It must hurt when you have nothing to back up what you say.<br /><br />Brible's link was proven o be incorrect by the vast amount of information contained in the book More Guns, Less Crime, by John Lott. Also this link did not provide a example of a single gun control law that made any place more safe.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.com